Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on March 25, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(6):1902-1909; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm825
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/6/1902    most recent
gfm825v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bird, N. J
Right arrow Articles by Peters, A M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bird, N. J
Right arrow Articles by Peters, A M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Reproducibilities and responses to food intake of GFR measured with chromium-51-EDTA and iohexol simultaneously and independently in normal subjects

Nicholas J Bird1, Christina Peters1, A Robert Michell2 and A Michael Peters1

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge 2 Department of Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, St Bartholomew's Medical School, London, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: A. M. Peters, Audrey Emerton Building, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK. Tel: +44-1273-523360; Fax: +44-1273-523366; E-mail: a.m.peters{at}bsms.ac.uk



  Abstract

Background. The aim was to evaluate the reproducibility of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured with iohexol and its response to food in a direct and independent comparison with Cr-51-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and examine the influence of two different whole body scaling parameters, body surface area (BSA) and extracellular fluid volume (ECV).

Methods. Fasting and non-fasting GFR were measured in 20 normal volunteers using Cr-51-EDTA and iohexol, simultaneously injected into opposite arms. In 10, the fasting study was repeated. Venous samples obtained bilaterally 20, 40, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min after injection were assayed for indicator injected contralaterally—Cr-51-EDTA by well-counting and iohexol by X-ray fluorescence. GFR scaled to BSA was measured from six samples (GFR/BSA6) and from the last three (GFR/BSA3). GFR scaled to ECV was calculated as the mean transit time of marker using six samples (GFR/ECV6) or the last three (GFR/ECV3).

Results. GFR/BSA3 was reproducible (coefficient of variations of 7.4% for Cr-51-EDTA and 7.6% for iohexol). Using Cr-51-EDTA, GFR/ECV3 (9.1%) and GFR/ECV6 (7.7%) were as reproducible as GFR/BSA3 and GFR/BSA6 (both 8.1%). However, GFR/ECV3 measured with iohexol had poorer reproducibility (16.8%). Food resulted in an increase in scaled GFR of about 5 ml/min but this was statistically significant only with respect to GFR/BSA (measured with Cr-51-EDTA or iohexol) and not GFR/ECV.

Conclusions. Measured with Cr-51-EDTA, but not iohexol, GFR/ECV was as reproducible as GFR/BSA. GFR/BSA, measured with Cr-51-EDTA or iohexol, but not GFR/ECV, significantly increased after food.

Keywords: Cr-51-EDTA; extracellular fluid volume; glomerular filtration rate; iohexol; X-ray fluorescence

Received for publication: 27. 6.07
Accepted in revised form: 17.10.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Delanaye, C. Mariat, E. Cavalier, and J.-M. Krzesinski
Errors induced by indexing glomerular filtration rate for body surface area: reductio ad absurdum
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 3, 2009; (2009) gfp431v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
R. J. Glassock and C. G. Winearls
eGFR: Readjusting Its Rating
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2009; 4(5): 867 - 869.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
A M. Peters, N. J Bird, I. Halsall, C. Peters, and A R. Michell
Evaluation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (eGFR) against simultaneous, dual-marker multi-sample measurements of glomerular filtration rate
Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 58 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. J. Bird, C. Peters, A. R. Michell, and A. M. Peters
Effect of extracellular fluid volume on single-sample measurement of glomerular filtration rate
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 104 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Delanaye, E. Cavalier, M. Froissart, and J. M. Krzesinski
Reproducibility of GFR measured by chromium-51-EDTA and iohexol
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 4077 - 4078.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.