Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 16, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(12):3845-3850; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn385
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
23/12/3845    most recent
gfn385v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noble, E.
Right arrow Articles by Isbel, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noble, E.
Right arrow Articles by Isbel, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008].
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



The impact of automated eGFR reporting and education on nephrology service referrals

Euan Noble1, David W. Johnson1, Nicholas Gray2, Peter Hollett2, Carmel M. Hawley1, Scott B. Campbell1, David W. Mudge1 and Nicole M. Isbel1

1 Department of Renal Medicine, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane 2 Department of Renal Medicine, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, Australia

Correspondence and offprint requests to: David Johnson, Department of Renal Medicine, Level 2, Ambulatory Renal and Transplant Services Building, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane QLD 4102, Australia. Tel: +61-7-3240-5080; Fax: +61-7-3240-5480; E-mail: david_johnson{at}health.qld.gov.au, johnsond{at}health.qld.gov.au



  Abstract

Background. Serum creatinine concentration is an unreliable and insensitive marker of chronic kidney disease (CKD). To improve CKD detection, the Australasian Creatinine Consensus Working Committee recommended reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula with every request for serum creatinine concentration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of automated laboratory reporting of eGFR on the quantity and quality of referrals to nephrology services in Southeast Queensland, Australia.

Methods. Outpatient referrals to a tertiary and regional renal service, and a single private practice were prospectively audited over 3–12 months prior to and 12 months following the introduction of automated eGFR reporting and concomitant clinician education. The appropriateness of referrals to a nephrologist was assessed according to the Kidney Check Australia Taskforce (KCAT) criteria. Significant changes in the quantity and/or quality of referrals over time were analysed by exponentially weighed moving average (EWMA) charts with control limits based on ±3 standard deviations.

Results. A total of 1019 patients were referred to the centres during the study period. Monthly referrals overall increased by 40% following the introduction of eGFR reporting, and this was most marked for the tertiary renal service (52% above baseline). The appropriateness of nephrologist referrals, as adjudicated by the KCAT criteria, fell significantly from 74.3% in the 3 months pre-eGFR reporting to 65.2% in the 12 months thereafter (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, a greater absolute number of CKD patients were appropriately being referred for nephrologist review in the post-eGFR period (24 versus 15 per month). Patients referred following the introduction of eGFR were significantly more likely to be older (median 63.2 versus 59.3 years, P < 0.05), diabetic (25 versus 18%, P = 0.05) and have stage 3 CKD (48% versus 36%, P < 0.01).

Conclusion. The introduction of automated eGFR calculation has led to an overall increase in referrals with a small but significant decrease in referral quality. The increase in referrals was seen predominantly in older and diabetic patients with stage 3 CKD and appeared to result in net benefit.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; Cockcroft–Gault equation; glomerular filtration rate; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation; serum creatinine

Received for publication: 24. 4.08
Accepted in revised form: 17. 6.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
G. Baer, N. Lameire, and W. Van Biesen
Late referral of patients with end-stage renal disease: an in-depth review and suggestions for further actions
NDT Plus, April 29, 2009; (2009) sfp050v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
C. K. Cheung and S. Bhandari
Perspectives on eGFR reporting from the Interface between Primary and Secondary Care
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2009; 4(2): 258 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.