Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on May 25, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(11):3592-3598; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn299
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/11/3592    most recent
gfn299v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winnett, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ashman, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winnett, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ashman, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Trisodium citrate 46.7% selectively and safely reduces staphylococcal catheter-related bacteraemia

Georgia Winnett1, Jonathan Nolan1, Michael Miller2 and Neil Ashman1

1 Renal Unit 2 Department of Infection, St Bartholomew's and the Royal London Hospitals, London, E1 1BB, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Neil Ashman, Renal Dialysis and Transport OPD, Renal and Cardiac Directorate, The Royal London Hospital, Basement, West Wing, Whitechapel, London, E1B 1BB, UK. Tel: +44-20-7377-7480; Fax: +44-20-7377-7003; E-mail: neil.ashman{at}bartsandthelondon.nhs.uk



  Abstract

Background. Trisodium citrate (TSC) 30% has been shown in a randomized control trial to be an effective antimicrobial catheter locking solution, able to significantly reduce catheter-related bacteraemia (CRB) in haemodialysis patients. Since that report, the formulation in Europe has been changed to 46.7% TSC without confirmatory data on efficacy. We report a 55 915 patient-day at risk experience in tunnelled lines of 46.7% TSC, emphasizing efficacy and changes in microbiology seen.

Methods. On 1 July 2006, inter-dialytic catheter locking solution was changed from 5000 IU/ml heparin to Citra-lockTM (46.7% TSC) in all haemodialysis patients at Barts and the London Renal Unit dialysing through an incident or prevalent tunnelled catheter. Prospectively collected blood culture data for the 6 months prior to the switch and 3 months at the end of the first year of TSC use were analysed. TSC tolerability was excellent with only a single withdrawal for intolerance of the agent. No major adverse events were reported.

Results. A major fall in CRB rates was noticed with a change from heparin (2.13/1000 catheter-days) in 2006 to TSC (0.81/1000 catheter-days) in 2007. This was due to significant reductions in staphylococcal CRB, true for sensitive, methicillin-resistant and coagulase-negative staphylococci. No increase in catheter malfunction was observed.

Conclusions. We found that 46.7% TSC is a safe, convenient and highly effective catheter locking solution, leading to significant reduction in CRB largely by preventing staphylococcal bloodstream infections. Given that Staphylococcus aureus in particular is associated with serious and often disseminated infection, TSC seems to be a powerful tool for dialysis units.

Keywords: antibiotic locking solutions; catheter-related bacteraemia; Staphylococcus aureus

Received for publication: 6. 3.08
Accepted in revised form: 5. 5.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H.-D. Polaschegg and K. Sodemann
Safety of concentrated trisodium citrate catheter locks
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 4075 - 4075.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.