NDT Advance Access originally published online on May 29, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(10):3219-3226; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn261
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vascular access use and outcomes: an international perspective from the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study
1 Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada 2 Department of Nephrology, University of Toronto/Humber River Regional Hospital, Weston, Ontario, Canada 3 Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4 Department of Epidemiology and Healthcare Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 5 Division of Nephrology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan 6 Department of Blood Purification and Internal Medicine, Kidney Center, Tokyo, Japan 7 Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France
Ronald L. Pisoni, Arbor Re- search Collaborative for Health, 315 West Huron St. Suite 360, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, USA. Tel: +1-734-665-4108 extn 223; Fax: +1-734-665-2103; E-mail: ronald.pisoni{at}arborresearch.org
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Background. A well-functioning vascular access (VA) is essential to efficient dialysis therapy. Guidelines have been implemented improving care, yet access use varies widely across countries and VA complications remain a problem. This study took advantage of the unique opportunity to utilize data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) to examine international trends in VA use and trends in patient characteristics and practices associated with VA use from 1996 to 2007. DOPPS is a prospective, observational study of haemodialysis (HD) practices and patient outcomes at >300 HD units from 12 countries and has collected data thus far from >35 000 randomly selected patients.
Methods. VA data were collected for each patient at study entry (1996–2007). Practice pattern data from the facility medical director, nurse manager and VA surgeon were also analysed.
Results. Since 2005, a native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) was used by 67–91% of prevalent patients in Japan, Italy, Germany, France, Spain, the UK, Australia and New Zealand, and 50–59% in Belgium, Sweden and Canada. From 1996 to 2007, AVF use rose from 24% to 47% in the USA but declined in Italy, Germany and Spain. Moreover, graft use fell by 50% in the USA from 58% use in 1996 to 28% by 2007. Across three phases of data collection, patients consistently were less likely to use an AVF versus other VA types if female, of older age, having greater body mass index, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease or recurrent cellulitis/gangrene. In addition, countries with a greater prevalence of diabetes in HD patients had a significantly lower percentage of patients using an AVF. Despite poorer outcomes for central vein catheters, catheter use rose 1.5- to 3-fold among prevalent patients in many countries from 1996 to 2007, even among non-diabetic patients 18–70 years old. Furthermore, 58–73% of patients new to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) used a catheter for the initiation of HD in five countries despite 60–79% of patients having been seen by a nephrologist >4 months prior to ESRD. Patients were significantly (P < 0.05) less likely to start dialysis with a permanent VA if treated in a faciity that (1) had a longer time from referral to access surgery evaluation or from evaluation to access creation and (2) had longer time from access creation until first AVF cannulation. The median time from referral until access creation varied from 5–6 days in Italy, Japan and Germany to 40–43 days in the UK and Canada. Compared to patients using an AVF, patients with a catheter displayed significantly lower mean Kt/V levels.
Conclusions. Most countries meet the contemporary National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative goal for AVF use; however, there is still a wide variation in VA preference. Delays between the creation and cannulation must be improved to enhance the chances of a future permanent VA. Native arteriovenous fistula is the VA of choice ensuring dialysis adequacy and better patient outcomes. Graft is, however, a better alternative than catheter for patients where the creation of an attempted AVF failed or could not be created for different reasons.
Keywords: arteriovenous fistulae; catheter; DOPPS; haemodialysis; vascular access
Received for publication: 28. 8.07
Accepted in revised form: 15. 4.08
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y.-Y. Ng, S.-C. Wu, Y.-N. Hung, and P.-J. Ko Effect of demographic characteristics and timing of vascular access maturation on patency in Chinese incident haemodialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 8, 2009; (2009) gfp269v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|