Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on April 4, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(8):2297-2303; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm176
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/8/2297    most recent
gfm176v2
gfm176v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prakash, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hux, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prakash, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hux, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Regional effects of satellite haemodialysis units on renal replacement therapy in non-urban Ontario, Canada

Suma Prakash1,3, Peter C. Austin2,3, Matthew J. Oliver1, Amit X. Garg2,4, Peter G. Blake4 and Janet E. Hux1,2,3

1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), 3University of Toronto, Toronto and 4London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr S. Prakash, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Building 100, Room 342, San Francisco, CA 94110, California, USA. Email: suma74{at}gmail.com



  Abstract

Background. To provide better dialysis care to rural communities, the Ministry of Health chose to build satellite haemodialysis (HD) units, which are affiliated with, but are distant to, a main renal centre. We considered whether constructing such units in rural regions of Ontario, Canada, alleviated under-service of rates of renal replacement therapy (RRT) locally, decreased patient travel distance and decreased local peritoneal dialysis (PD) utilization.

Methods. We compared two groups of rural regions at two time points (years 1995 and 2002) in a before and after cross-sectional study. These regions were either already serviced by a satellite unit in 1995 (control group, 10 communities), or had new satellite units built between the years 1995 and 2002 (exposure group, 24 communities).

Results. The exposure group had a slightly greater increase in prevalent rate of RRT over time, but this did not reach statistical significance (control group increased 401 per million, exposure group 436 per million, P = 0.8). The mean weekly travel distance was reduced by 210.6 km after the construction of new satellite units (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in reduction of PD proportion (P = 0.4). There was a significant increase in the number of elderly receiving RRT once local access was provided.

Conclusions. In conclusion, constructing satellite units increased access to renal care for elderly patients and reduced travel time for HD patients living in rural communities.

Keywords: ESRD, haemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; regional variation; RRT rate


This version contains a minor correction to the second authors name.

Received for publication: 16.12.06
Accepted in revised form: 6. 3.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J STD AIDSHome page
O Olonilua, J D C Ross, C Mercer, F Keane, G Brook, and J A Cassell
The limits of health-care seeking behaviour: how long will patients travel for STI care? Evidence from England's 'Patient Access and the Transmission of Sexually Transmitted Infections' ('PATSI') study
Int J STD AIDS, December 1, 2008; 19(12): 814 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.