Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on April 3, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(8):2194-2200; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm114
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/8/2194    most recent
gfm114v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in NDT
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jafar, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Levey, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jafar, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Levey, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Use of albumin creatinine ratio and urine albumin concentration as a screening test for albuminuria in an Indo-Asian population

Tazeen H. Jafar1,2,3,4, Nish Chaturvedi4, Juanita Hatcher2 and Andrew S. Levey3

1Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, 2Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan, 3Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA and 4National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Tazeen H. Jafar, Head, Section of Nephrology, Director, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, PO Box 3500, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan. Email: tazeen.jafar{at}aku.edu



  Abstract

Background. Albuminuria (>30 mg/day) based on 24 h urine albumin excretion is one of the criteria for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Differences in urine albumin concentration and creatinine excretion rates between Indo-Asians and other populations may require different threshold values for detection of albuminuria. We compared the use of spot urine albumin concentration and urine albumin to creatinine excretion ratio for detection of albuminuria in this population.

Methods. A total of 577 subjects aged ≥40 years, 54% of whom were women, were recruited from the general population in Karachi, Pakistan. Albumin concentration (mg/l) and albumin to creatinine ratio (mg/g of creatinine) were determined in a spot morning urine sample, and albuminuria (30 mg/day or greater) measured in a 24 h urine collected on the subsequent day.

Results. The median (25–75 percentile) of urine albumin excretion was 4.8 (3.6–10.3) mg/day: 5.4 (3.7–12.5) mg/day in men and 4.5 (3.8–8.9) mg/day in women. The overall prevalence (95% CI) of albuminuria was 11.8% (7.2–12.0%): 14.8% in men and 9.2% in women (P = 0.04). The areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for urine albumin concentration were 0.86 (0.82–0.90) and 0.88 (0.84–0.92), respectively, in women and men. The areas under the ROC curves for albumin to creatinine ratio were 0.86 (0.82–0.89) and 0.90 (0.86–0.93), respectively, in women and men. For urine albumin concentration, the sensitivity and specificity were 37 and 97%, respectively, in women and 69 and 94%, respectively, in men at the conventionally recommended value of 2 mg/dl. The discriminator value of urine albumin concentration identified in the analysis was 0.5 mg/dl in women (sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 75%) and 1.7 mg/dl in men (sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 93%). For the albumin to creatinine ratio, the sensitivity and specificity were 46 and 95%, respectively, in women and 60 and 97%, respectively, in men at cut-off value of 30 mg/g.

Conclusion. Both urine albumin concentration and albumin to creatinine ratio are acceptable tests for population screening for albuminuria in Indo-Asians. While sensitivities may be suboptimal, particularly in women, lowering the existing thresholds would compromise specificity. Those who screen positive need evaluation and management of CKD and prevention of CVD.

Keywords: Albuminuria; Asian; chronic kidney disease; proteinuria; population screening; urine albumin concentration; urine albumin to creatinine ratio

Received for publication: 30.11.06
Accepted in revised form: 9. 2.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in NDT:

Methodology of screening for albuminuria
R. T. Gansevoort, Heerspink Lambers, and E. C. Witte
NDT 2007 22: 2109-2111. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  

In this issue ...

NDT 2007 22: i. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
M. Guy, J. K Borzomato, R. G Newall, P. A Kalra, and C. P Price
Protein and albumin-to-creatinine ratios in random urines accurately predict 24 h protein and albumin loss in patients with kidney disease
Ann Clin Biochem, November 1, 2009; 46(6): 468 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. H. Jafar, Z. Qadri, and S. Hashmi
Prevalence of microalbuminuria and associated electrocardiographic abnormalities in an Indo-Asian population
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 2111 - 2116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
B. G. Jaar, R. Khatib, L. Plantinga, L. E. Boulware, and N. R. Powe
Principles of Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 601 - 609.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.