Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on January 25, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(4):1198-1204; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl732
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/1198    most recent
gfl732v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moriya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moriya, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kobayashi, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Aortic stiffness, left ventricular hypertrophy and weekly averaged blood pressure (WAB) in patients on haemodialysis

Hidekazu Moriya, Takayasu Ohtake and Shuzo Kobayashi

Shonan Kamakura General Hospital—Nephrology, 1202-1, Yamazaki Kamakura Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Hidekazu Moriya, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital—Nephrology, 1202-1, Yamazaki Kamakura Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan. Email: hidekazu.moriya{at}tokushukai.jp



  Abstract

Background. In haemodialysis (HD) patients, no consensus has been reached with regard to the desired blood pressure (BP) level and when or how BP should be monitored. Moreover, BP variability over a period of 1 week has not been well studied in HD patients.

Methods. The present study is an observational study that comprised 101 HD patients (65 males and 36 females). We used daily home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring to record a total of 20 points of BP over a period of 1 week, including measurements of the wake-up and night BPs; this was in addition to the BP recorded before and after each HD session that occurred three times a week. The average of these 20 BP measurements was defined as the weekly averaged blood pressure (WAB). Finally, we studied the relationship between the WAB and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) or aortic stiffness measured by baPWV.

Results. The systolic (142.5 ± 19.5 mmHg) and diastolic (.78.8 ± 9.9 mmHg) WABs were almost consistent with the wake-up BP on the day after the midweek dialysis session (R2 = 0.709 and 0.775, respectively). The WAB showed significant positive correlations with the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (R = 0.387, P < 0.001) and baPWV (R = 0.226, P < 0.05), whereas the predialysis systolic BP did not show a significant positive correlation with the LVMI.

Conclusion. The WAB is a useful marker for evaluating the BP of HD patients and correlates well with the LVMI or baPWV.

Keywords: blood pressure variability; haemodialysis; hypertension; left ventricular hypertrophy; pulse wave velocity

Received for publication: 10. 5.06
Accepted in revised form: 5.11.06


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CJASNHome page
H. Moriya, M. Oka, K. Maesato, T. Mano, R. Ikee, T. Ohtake, and S. Kobayashi
Weekly Averaged Blood Pressure Is More Important than a Single-Point Blood Pressure Measurement in the Risk Stratification of Dialysis Patients
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 416 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Agarwal
Home BP for assessing haemodialysis hypertension
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 3089 - 3090.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.