Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 19, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(12):3638-3645; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm468
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/12/3638    most recent
gfm468v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yau, W.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yau, W.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Is a standard fixed dose of mycophenolate mofetil ideal for all patients?

Wai-Ping Yau1, Anantharaman Vathsala2, Huei-Xin Lou3 and Eli Chan1

1Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, 2Department of Renal Medicine and 3Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore

Correspondence to: Associate Prof. Eli Chan, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore. Email: phaelic{at}nus.edu.sg



  Abstract

Background. A standard fixed dose of 2 g/day of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), irrespective of total body weight (TBW), is recommended when used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids in renal transplantation.

Methods. To determine the optimal MMF dose in a population with wide variation in TBW, steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) was performed in 53 Asian (Chinese, Malay, Indian, Eurasian) renal transplant recipients (RTX) receiving MMF [250–1000 mg twice daily (BD)] for at least 3 months. Blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 6 h after the MMF dose and total MPA quantified using HPLC.

Results. Drug exposure, as evaluated by AUCss, 0–12, demonstrated a significant positive correlation with TBW-adjusted MMF dose (outliers omitted: r2 = 0.49, P < 0.0005). An AUCss, 0–12 of 45 mg h/l could be attained with an MMF dose of 12 mg/kg BD.

Conclusion. This study proposes that MMF should be dosed based on TBW rather than a fixed dose regimen in RTX.

Keywords: asian; cyclosporine; mycophenolic acid; pharmacokinetics; renal transplant; weight-adjusted dosing

Received for publication: 16. 5.07
Accepted in revised form: 19. 6.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.