NDT Advance Access originally published online on June 30, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(12):3601-3605; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm416
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis of the factors conditioning the diffusion of peritoneal dialysis in Italy
1Renal and Dialysis Unit, San Lazzaro Hospital, Alba (CN), Via Pierino Belli 26, 12051 Alba (CN) 2Renal and Dialysis Unit, Regional Hospital, Aosta 3Scientific Committee of Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group of Italian Society of Nephrology and 4Renal, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, University of Bari, Policlinico, Bari, Italy
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Giusto Viglino, S.O.C. di Nefrologia e Dialisi, Ospedale San Lazzaro, Via Pierino Belli 26, 12051 Alba (CN), Italy. Email: gviglino{at}asl18.it
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Background. The diffusion of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in Italy is lower than expected on the basis of indications and contraindications reported in literature.
Methods. To analyse the factors influencing the use of PD in Italy, we used data from the first National Census of the Italian Society of Nephrology relating to 9773 incident patients (IncidHD + PD) in 2004 and 43 293 prevalent patients dialysed in 658 centres at 31/12/2004 (337 public centres, 286 private centres, 12 paediatric centres, 15 research or religious institutions and 8 unspecified).
Results. The percentages on PD of total incident (IncPD%) and prevalent dialysis patients (PrevPD%) were 15.9% and 10.3%, respectively with considerable variations from region to region and from centre to centre. The IncPD% was higher in regions with fewer patients on dialysis in private centres. In the private centres, the IncPD% was 0.4%. Of the 325 non-paediatric public centres, 116 (35.7%) do not use PD: compared with the 209 centres which do, these centres have a lower mean IncHD + PD and PrevHD + PD per centre (13.0 ± 12.3 vs 28.6 ± 18.0 – 51.8 ± 35.7 vs 117.3 ± 66.4 patients, P < 0.0001), and more haemodialysis (HD) stations available (3.0 vs 3.5 patients per HD station, P < 0.0001). However, the significant influence of cultural and motivational factors on the use of this method is demonstrated by the fact that it is used by 34% of the smaller non-paediatric public centres, and is not used by 19% of the larger non-pediatric public centres.
Keywords: end stage renal disease; haemodialysis; healthcare; modality selection; patient preferences; peritoneal dialysis; patient education; renal replacement therapy; survival
Received for publication: 22. 5.07
Accepted in revised form: 4. 6.07
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W. v. Biesen, N. Veys, N. Lameire, and R. Vanholder Why less success of the peritoneal dialysis programmes in Europe? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1478 - 1481. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|