Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on February 27, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(8):2210-2216; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/8/2210    most recent
gfl064v2
gfl064v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McIntyre, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Naish, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McIntyre, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Naish, P. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Original Articles: Dialysis and Transplantation

Patients receiving maintenance dialysis have more severe functionally significant skeletal muscle wasting than patients with dialysis-independent chronic kidney disease

Christopher W. McIntyre1,2, Nicholas M. Selby1, Mhairi Sigrist1, Lyndsay E. Pearce1, Thomas H. Mercer3 and Patrick F. Naish4

1 Department of Renal Medicine, Derby City General Hospital, Derby, 2 Centre for Integrated Systems Biology and Medicine, University of Nottingham, 3 School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor and 4 Department of Nephrology, North Staffordshire Hospital Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr C McIntyre, Department of Renal Medicine, Derby City General Hospital, Uttoxeter Rd, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK. Email: Chris.McIntyre{at}derbyhospitals.nhs.uk

Background. Chronic renal replacement therapy patients exhibit reduction in skeletal muscle function as a result of a combination of metabolic effects and muscle fibre size reduction. The aim of this study was to compare muscle mass with function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at stages 4 and 5 on haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD), and investigate the associations of muscle wasting in a cross-sectional cohort.

Methods. We studied 134 patients (60 HD, 28 PD and 46 CKD 4). The three groups were well matched for age, sex, diabetes and dialysis vintage. Cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle and fat was measured from a standardized multi-slice CT scan of a 6 cm long section of thigh. CSA of soft tissue was taken from appropriate fat and muscle densities. Functional assessment was by the sit-to-stand 60 test, assessing both the number of sit-to-stands possible under controlled conditions in 60 s (STS 60), and the time taken to perform five sit-to-stand movements (STS 5). Data were collected on a wide range of potential determinants of muscle CSA.

Results. There were no significant differences in haemoglobin between males or females or between any of the groups studied. Serum phosphate and calcium-phosphate product were higher in HD patients as compared to CKD4 patients, but there were no differences in these variables when comparing PD patients with either CKD4 or HD patients. Muscle CSA correlated well with objective functional assessments in males (STS 60 R = 0.52, P<0.0001) and females (R = 0.41, P = 0.004), and STS performance was reduced in dialysed patients as compared with CKD 4. Univariate analysis demonstrated that muscle CSA was associated with serum albumin concentration (R = 0.49, P<0.0001), age (R = –0.35, P = 0.005) and C-reactive protein (R = –0.34, P = 0.004). Creatinine clearance, dialysis adequacy, dialysis vintage and time-averaged serum bicarbonate, calcium and phosphate concentrations were not correlated with muscle CSA.

Conclusion. In conclusion, patients with dialysis-treated CKD 5 exhibited more functionally significant muscle wasting than patients with CKD 4. This may be amenable to modification with targeted exercise or amelioration of factors associated with observed differences in muscle mass.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; computed tomography; haemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; skeletal muscle; wasting


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. Labriola, P. Wallemacq, B. Gulbis, and M. Jadoul
The impact of the assay for measuring albumin on corrected ('adjusted') calcium concentrations
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1834 - 1838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P.-S. Lee, K. Sampath, S. A. Karumanchi, H. Tamez, I. Bhan, T. Isakova, O. M. Gutierrez, M. Wolf, Y. Chang, T. P. Stossel, et al.
Plasma Gelsolin and Circulating Actin Correlate with Hemodialysis Mortality
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2009; 20(5): 1140 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Biolo, M. Stulle, F. Bianco, G. Mengozzi, R. Barazzoni, A. Vasile, G. Panzetta, and G. Guarnieri
Insulin action on glucose and protein metabolism during L-carnitine supplementation in maintenance haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 991 - 997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. L. Johansen
Exercise in the End-Stage Renal Disease Population
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1845 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.