Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on January 5, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(5):1382-1388; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfk028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/5/1382    most recent
gfk028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magil, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tinckam, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magil, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tinckam, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Original Articles: Dialysis and Transplantation

Focal peritubular capillary C4d deposition in acute rejection

Alexander B. Magil1 and Kathryn J. Tinckam2

1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and 2 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Alex Magil, Laboratory, St.Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6. Email: amagil{at}providencehealth.bc.ca

Background. Diffuse peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition has been shown to be associated with relatively poor graft outcome. The significance of focal PTC C4d staining in the early post-transplant period is uncertain.

Methods. Sixty-five biopsies from 53 patients with acute rejection were graded (Banff ’97 criteria), stained for C4d, monocytes and T cells, and divided into three groups according to PTC C4d: (i) focal C4d (F) (14 biopsies, 14 patients), (ii) diffuse C4d (D) (23 biopsies, 15 patients) and (iii) no C4d (N) (28 biopsies, 24 patients). The three groups were compared with respect to a variety of biopsy and clinical parameters including outcome.

Results. The incidence of transplant glomerulitis and glomerular monocyte infiltration were significantly greater in F (64% and 2.0±2.0) and D (57% and 3.4±2.0) than in N (11% and 0.2±0.2). A significantly higher proportion of F (93%) demonstrated acute cellular rejection (Banff ’97 grade ≥1A) than did D (35%). The F and D groups included significantly more females (50 and 67%, respectively) than did N (21%). The percentage of patients with a second or third transplant was higher in F (29%) and D (40%) than in N (8%) (P = 0.0589). The proportion of patients with glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min at 12, 24 and 48 months was higher in the D and F groups than in the N, and there was a statistically significant increasing trend in odds of this outcome occurring at 48 months across the three groups (D>F>N group) (P = 0.0416).

Conclusion. The results suggest that the biopsy findings and clinical course in patients with focal PTC C4d staining are similar to those associated with diffuse C4d.

Keywords: acute rejection; focal c4d; monocytes; prognosis; transplant glomerulitis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. B. Colvin
Antibody-Mediated Renal Allograft Rejection: Diagnosis and Pathogenesis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1046 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.