Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on October 4, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(1):197-202; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi113
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/197    most recent
gfi113v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Büchler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keown, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Büchler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keown, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Original Articles: Dialysis and Transplantation

Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases

Matthias Büchler1, Steve Chadban2, Edward Cole3, Karsten Midtvedt4, Eric Thervet5, Hans Prestele6 and Paul Keown7

1 Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, C.H.U. Tours, Tours, France, 2 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 3 Renal Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada, 4 Medical Department of Nephrology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway, 5 Department of Renal Transplantation and Intensive Care, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France, 6 Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland and 7 Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Matthias Büchler, Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, C.H.U. Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé 37044 Tours, France. Email: buchler{at}med.univ-tours.fr

Background. Therapeutic drug monitoring for cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) is often performed using either trough levels (C0) or levels at 2 h post-dose (C2). This analysis assessed changes in C0 and C2 and their relationship to CsA-ME dose over time post-transplant in renal transplant patients.

Methods. Data were obtained from MO2ART, a prospective multicentre trial in which CsA-ME dose was adjusted based on C2 level. All 98 patients in whom C0 and C2 were available at day 5, month 3 and month 12 were included, out of 234 who completed the 12 month study. Normalized dose (ND) of CsA-ME, defined as dose per kilogram body weight, was calculated, together with C0/ND, C2/ND and C2/C0.

Results. C0/ND and C2/ND both increased between day 5 and month 3: C0/ND from 33±15 to 53±24 (ng/ml)/(mg/kg) and C2/ND from 161±64 to 248±80 (ng/ml)/(mg/kg). Between month 3 and month 12, C2/ND remained stable but C0/ND decreased to 42±20 (ng/ml)/(mg/kg) while the C2/C0 ratio increased from 5.2±1.9 to 6.5±2.3, indicating an acceleration of drug elimination. The inter-individual coefficient of variation was higher for C0/ND than for C2/ND at 3 months (45 vs 32%, P<0.05) and at 12 months (48 vs 31%, P<0.01).

Conclusions. CsA clearance accelerates between months 3 and 12 post-transplant, resulting in lower C0 levels for a given exposure (as measured by C2). As a consequence, C0 monitoring may progressively underestimate CsA exposure during the first year post-transplant. C2 monitoring contributes to improved individualized CsA-ME treatment in both the de novo phase and beyond month 3.

Keywords: absorption; C2 monitoring; cyclosporine microemulsion; renal transplantation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Sommerer, T. Giese, S. Meuer, and M. Zeier
Pharmacodynamic monitoring of calcineurin inhibitor therapy: Is there a clinical benefit?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 21 - 27.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.