Skip Navigation

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(Supplement 4):iv31-iv36; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh1085
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schellekens, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schellekens, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Follow-on biologics: challenges of the ‘next generation’

Huub Schellekens

Department of Innovation Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Huub Schellekens, MD, PhD, Department of Innovation Studies, Central Laboratory, Animal Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: huubs{at}xs4all.nl

The imminent patent expiration of many biopharmaceutical products will produce the possibility for generic versions of these therapeutic agents (i.e. biosimilars). However, there are a number of issues that will make approval of biosimilars much more complicated than the approval of generic equivalents of conventional pharmaceuticals. These issues centre on the intrinsic complexity of biopharmaceutical agents, which are recombinant proteins in most cases, and the heterogeneity of proteins produced by different manufacturing processes (i.e. differences in host cells, purification and processing, formulation and packaging). The increased occurrence of antibody (Ab)-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) associated with a change in the formulation of one particular epoetin-{alpha} product highlights the potential for increased immunogenicity of recombinant proteins with different formulations, or those manufactured by different processes. Thus, verification of the similarity to or substitutability of biosimilars with reference innovator biopharmaceutical products will require much more than a demonstration of pharmacokinetic similarity, which is sufficient for conventional, small molecule generic agents. Regulatory requirements for the approval of biosimilars have not yet been fully established, but preliminary guidelines from the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) state that the complexity of the product, the types of changes in the manufacturing process, and differences in quality, safety and efficacy must be taken into account when evaluating biosimilars. For most products, results of clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy are likely to be required. In addition, because of the unpredictability of the onset and incidence of immunogenicity, extended post-marketing surveillance is also important and may be required.

Keywords: biopharmaceuticals; bioequivalence; epoetin-{alpha}; generics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. J. Giezen, A. K. Mantel-Teeuwisse, S. M. J. M. Straus, H. Schellekens, H. G. M. Leufkens, and A. C. G. Egberts
Safety-Related Regulatory Actions for Biologicals Approved in the United States and the European Union
JAMA, October 22, 2008; 300(16): 1887 - 1896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Kuhlmann and A. Covic
The protein science of biosimilars
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2006; 21(suppl_5): v4 - v8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Kessler, D. Goldsmith, and H. Schellekens
Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2006; 21(suppl_5): v9 - v12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Locatelli and S. Roger
Comparative testing and pharmacovigilance of biosimilars
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2006; 21(suppl_5): v13 - v16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.