Skip Navigation

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(Supplement 3):iii3-iii24; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh1074
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, C.
Right arrow Articles by Perkins, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, C.
Right arrow Articles by Perkins, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Results of the European Survey on Anaemia Management 2003 (ESAM 2003): current status of anaemia management in dialysis patients, factors affecting epoetin dosage and changes in anaemia management over the last 5 years

Claude Jacobs1, Dieter Frei2 and Alan C. Perkins3

1 Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital La Pitié, Paris, France, 2 Ortho Biotech Europe, Baar, Switzerland and 3 Medians, Totnes, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Claude Jacobs, Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital de la Pitié, Salpêtrière, 83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. Email: claude.jacobs{at}psl.ap-hop-paris.fr

The European Survey of Anaemia Management 2003 (ESAM 2003) was a 1 day randomized survey conducted to assess anaemia management in dialysis patients 4 years after the introduction of the European Best Practice Guidelines. The survey included 8100 patients from 11 European countries and Israel. Overall, haemoglobin (Hb) levels ≥11.0 g/dl, as recommended by the guidelines, were achieved in 66% of patients. Only 48% of patients had adequate iron status, with transferrin saturation values missing for 27% and functional or absolute iron deficiency reported for 17 and 9%, respectively. In order to identify factors affecting epoetin dose and Hb levels, the countries were divided into two groups based on the percentage of patients with Hb levels ≥11.0 g/dl (>70% in group 1 and 60–70% in group 2). The most probable causes for better management in group 1 were administration of higher epoetin doses and better monitoring and management of iron status. In patients with Hb <11.0 g/dl, mean epoetin-{alpha}/ß doses were significantly lower for subcutaneous than intravenous (i.v.) administration, whereas mean doses were similar for both routes in patients with Hb ≥11.0 g/dl. When standardized for Hb levels, the dose ratio of i.v. epoetin-{alpha}/ß to i.v. darbepoetin alfa was 176:1 (95% confidence interval, 166:1–189:1). Limited comparisons between the eight countries that participated in ESAM 2003 and the original ESAM revealed that many patients still have haemoglobin levels below the current recommendations despite significant improvements in management of renal anaemia over the last 5 years.

Keywords: anaemia; chronic kidney disease; dialysis; epoetin; erythropoietin; iron status


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. David, P. Kumpers, G. M. Eisenbach, H. Haller, and J. T. Kielstein
Prospective evaluation of an in-centre conversion from conventional haemodialysis to an intensified nocturnal strategy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 2232 - 2240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
B. D. Bradbury, M. D. Danese, M. Gleeson, and C. W. Critchlow
Effect of Epoetin Alfa Dose Changes on Hemoglobin and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients with Hemoglobin Levels Persistently below 11 g/dL
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2009; 4(3): 630 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. David, P. Kumpers, V. Seidler, F. Biertz, H. Haller, and D. Fliser
Diagnostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for left ventricular dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 1370 - 1377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. M. West, K. Harris, M. S. Gilthorpe, C. Tolman, and E. J. Will
Functional Data Analysis Applied to a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Hemodialysis Patients Describes the Variability of Patient Responses in the Control of Renal Anemia
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 2371 - 2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Rossert
Foreword
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(suppl_3): iii1 - iii1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Barany and H.-J. Muller
Maintaining control over haemoglobin levels: optimizing the management of anaemia in chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(suppl_4): iv10 - iv18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Carrera, A. Disney, and M. Molina
Extended dosing intervals with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in chronic kidney disease: a review of clinical data
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(suppl_4): iv19 - iv30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
D. W. Johnson
INTRAVENOUS VERSUS ORAL IRON SUPPLEMENTATION IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS
Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S255 - S260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.