Skip Navigation

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(Supplement 2):ii33-ii39; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh1080
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuypers, D. R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuypers, D. R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Secondary effects of immunosuppressive drugs after simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation

Dirk R. J. Kuypers1, Jacques Malaise2, Kathleen Claes1, Pieter Evenepoel1, Bart Maes1, Willy Coosemans3, Jacques Pirenne3, Yves Vanrenterghem1 and the Euro-SPK Study Group

1 Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation and 3 Department of Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven and 2 Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Jacques Malaise, Department of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation and Organ Procurement, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10/2207, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium. Email: jacques.malaise{at}chir.ucl.ac.be

Background. This report examines the early and late secondary effects of tacrolimus, cyclosporin microemulsion (ME), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) in simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) recipients.

Methods. Of the 205 patients participating in the Euro-SPK 001 study, 103 were randomized to tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg) and 102 to cyclosporin-ME (7 mg/kg). All patients received rATG for 4 days [ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) 4 mg/kg/day or Thymoglobulin (Thymo-S) 1.25 mg/kg/day] plus MMF and short-term corticosteroids.

Results. Thymo-S induction therapy was associated with a lower white cell count in the first 3 months than was seen with ATG-F, while ATG-F caused a lower initial nadir in platelet count. Both polyclonal preparations were well tolerated and no clinically relevant differences were observed with respect to side effects such as infections and malignancies. High cyclosporin-ME trough levels were associated with pancreas graft thrombosis, and concentrations >150 ng/ml were associated with poor renal allograft function. Treatment discontinuation was higher with cyclosporin-ME (57.8%) than with tacrolimus-based therapy (36.9%) due to more frequent toxicity, graft loss and lack of efficacy requiring a switch to tacrolimus. The main reason for withdrawal in the tacrolimus group was MMF discontinuation; MMF-related side effects resulted in more frequent dose reductions to <2 g/day and discontinuations in the tacrolimus group, and indirectly indicate a higher dose-corrected exposure to mycophenolic acid, as previously observed in kidney transplant patients.

Conclusions. Short-term induction therapy is effective and well tolerated in patients undergoing SPK transplantation. Tacrolimus was the preferred immunosuppressive agent, resulting in fewer cases of pancreas graft loss and drug discontinuation compared with cyclosporin-ME.

Keywords: ATG; cyclosporin microemulsion; kidney–pancreas transplantation; MMF; multicentre study; tacrolimus


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.