Skip Navigation

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(Supplement 2):ii18-ii24; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh1078
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Secchi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Secchi, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Metabolic results 3 years after simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation

Antonio Secchi1, Jacques Malaise2, Rossana Caldara1 and the Euro-SPK Study Group

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy and 2 Department of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation and Organ Procurement, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Jacques Malaise, Department of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation and Organ Procurement, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10/2207, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium. Email: jacques.malaise{at}chir.ucl.ac.be

Background. Simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplantation has become accepted therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal disease. This 3-year study compared the metabolic effects of tacrolimus- and cyclosporin microemulsion (ME)-based immunosuppressive therapy in this clinical setting.

Methods. The study population comprised the 205 patients enrolled in the Euro-SPK 001 study. Glucose metabolism parameters [fasting blood glucose, fasting C-peptide and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)], blood lipids (total cholesterol and triglycerides) and pancreatic enzymes (lipase and amylase) were monitored at regular intervals during the study. Blood pressure was also carefully monitored and compared with target levels for diabetic patients.

Results. Fasting C-peptide and HbA1c levels were within the normal ranges in the two treatment groups throughout the 3 years. Fasting blood glucose was higher during the first 2 months post-transplant in the tacrolimus group than in the cyclosporin-ME group, but no differences were seen thereafter. From month 2 post-transplant, mean levels of total cholesterol were significantly lower among patients receiving tacrolimus than among those in the cyclosporin-ME group. In addition, patients receiving cyclosporin-ME showed serological features of mild pancreatitis, with elevated blood amylase and lipase levels during the first 6 months post-transplant. The two regimens were comparable with respect to hypertension.

Conclusions. Except for lipid profiles, no major differences in metabolic effects or blood pressure control were observed over the 3 years in SPK transplant patients receiving immunosuppression based on tacrolimus or cyclosporin-ME. In view of the potential risk of hypertension, antihypertensive strategies should be implemented for all patients.

Keywords: amylase; blood lipids; glucose metabolism; lipase; simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation; type 1 diabetes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.