Skip Navigation

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(Supplement 1):i2-i5; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh1066
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Patzak, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Persson, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Patzak, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 20 Suppl 1 © ERA–EDTA 2005; all rights reserved

Renal haemodynamic alterations in contrast medium-induced nephropathy and the benefit of hydration

Pontus B. Persson and Andreas Patzak

Institute of Physiology, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Dr Pontus B. Persson, Institut für Vegetative Physiologie, Humboldt Universität, Berlin, Medizinische Fakultät (Charité), Tucholskystr. 2, D-10117 Berlin, Germany. Email: pontus.persson{at}charite.de

Though several suggestions have been put forward, the underlying mechanism of contrast medium-induced nephropathy (CIN) is not clear. Most probably, however, the culprit is a combination of various mechanisms working together to cause the development of CIN. The generally accepted main factors in the pathophysiology of CIN are the reduction in renal perfusion by contrast media (CM) combined with the toxic effects on the tubular cells. With regard to the literature, misconceptions are widespread when explaining the development of CIN, e.g. that osmolar challenge induces renal vasoconstriction due to the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism (TGF). Although popular, this assumption is most probably false, since osmotic pressure is not the signal for the TGF. Much attention has been paid to reducing the osmolarity of CM further. In an effort to obtain iso-osmolar CM, dimers were formed. These CM have osmolarities in the near physiological range, but at the cost of increased viscosity. This seems to have adverse effects with regard to kidney haemodynamics. In contrast to the multifarious interpretations of CIN, it is generally accepted that hydration is effective in preventing CIN from occuring. There is no universally accepted explanation for the effect of hydration, but it may rely on enhancing renal medullary blood flow and reducing the viscosity of the fluid in the collecting duct.

Keywords: contrast medium-induced nephropathy; haemodynamics; hydration; tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. O. Downes, M. Heinrich, and M. Uder
In vitro study of various iodinated contrast media.
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 918 - 921.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Heinrich, M. Uder, and T. Gleeson
Pathogenesis of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 1079 - 1079.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.