Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on March 22, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(6):1155-1163; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh775
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/6/1155    most recent
gfh775v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beerenhout, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kooman, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beerenhout, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kooman, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org


Original Article

Pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration vs low-flux haemodialysis: a randomized prospective study

Charles H. Beerenhout1, Antinus J. Luik5, Suzan G. J. Jeuken-Mertens5, Otto Bekers4, Paul Menheere4, Linda Hover3, Leny Klaassen6, Frank M. van der Sande1, Emile C. Cheriex2, Natalie Meert7, Karel M. Leunissen1 and Jeroen P. Kooman1

1 Department of Nephrology, 2 Department of Cardiology, 3 Department of Nutrition and 4 Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands, 5 Department of Internal Medicine and 6 Department of Nutrition, Vie Curi, Venlo, The Netherlands and 7 Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Gent, Belgium

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Jeroen P. Kooman, MD PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. Email: jkoo{at}sint.azm.nl

Background. Accumulation of larger molecular weight uraemic toxins molecules may have a negative effect on the cardiovascular and nutritional state of dialysis patients and influence uraemic symptomatology. Their clearance can be enhanced by the use of haemofiltration (HF).

Methods. The effects of low-flux haemodialysis (HD) (ultrapure dialysate; polyamide membranes) and pre-dilution on-line HF (1:1 blood/substitution ratio; target filtration volume: 1.2 times body weight) on cardiovascular and nutritional parameters, interdialytic levels of uraemic toxins and quality of life (QOL; Laupacis questionnaire) were assessed during 1 year follow-up. Forty patients were randomized.

Results. After 1 year, 27 patients were eligible for analysis (HF: 13 patients; HD: 14 patients). Left ventricular mass index did not change in the HF patients (127±33 -> 131±36 g/m2 after 12 months) or in the HD group (135±34 -> 138±32 g/m2). Also, there were no changes in pulse wave velocity, and 48 h systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Lean body mass, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, increased in the HF group (44.8±8.9 -> 46.2±9.6 kg; P<0.05), but not in the HD group (49.4±9.2 -> 50.6±8.8 kg), although differences between groups were not significant. Insulin-like growth factor-1 levels remained stable in the HF patients, but decreased in the HD group (P<0.05 between groups). QOL for physical symptoms improved in the HF group (4.2±1.2 -> 5.0±1.1; P<0.05 within the HF group and P = 0.06 between groups), but not in the HD group (4.0±1.0 -> 4.4±1.4). ß2-microglobulin, complement factor D and homocysteine decreased significantly in the HF but not in the HD group, whereas L-ADMA, leptin and advanced glycation end-products-related fluorescence did not change.

Conclusions. No changes in cardiovascular parameters were observed during pre-dilution on-line HF compared with low-flux HD. Treatment with on-line HF resulted in marked changes in the uraemic toxicity profile, an improvement in physical well-being and a small improvement in nutritional state.

Keywords: cardiovascular; haemofiltration; homocysteine; left ventricular mass; pre-dilution on-line; pulse wave velocity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. A. Pedrini, A. Feliciani, S. Zerbi, G. Cozzi, and P. Ruggiero
Optimization of mid-dilution haemodiafiltration: technique and performance
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 6, 2009; (2009) gfp207v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. C. van der Weerd, E. L. Penne, M. A. van den Dorpel, M. P.C. Grooteman, M. J. Nube, M. L. Bots, P. M. ter Wee, and P. J. Blankestijn
Haemodiafiltration: promise for the future?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 438 - 443.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Feliciani, M. A. Riva, S. Zerbi, P. Ruggiero, A. R. Plati, G. Cozzi, and L. A. Pedrini
New strategies in haemodiafiltration (HDF): prospective comparative analysis between on-line mixed HDF and mid-dilution HDF
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1672 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.