Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on March 22, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(6):1148-1154; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh770
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/6/1148    most recent
gfh770v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buemi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Teti, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buemi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Teti, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org


Original Article

The effect of two different protocols of potassium haemodiafiltration on QT dispersion

Michele Buemi1, Emanuele Aloisi1, Giuseppe Coppolino1, Saverio Loddo2, Eleonora Crascì1, Carmela Aloisi1, Antonio Barillà1, Vincenzo Cosentini1, Lorena Nostro1, Chiara Caccamo1, Fulvio Floccari1, Adolfo Romeo1, Nicola Frisina1 and Diana Teti2

1 Chair of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine and 2 Department of Pathology and Experimental Microbiology, University of Messina, Italy

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Michele Buemi, Via Salita Villa Contino, 30. 98100 Messina, Italy. Email: buemim{at}unime.it

Background. The risk of developing cardiovascular diseases is higher in patients on haemodialysis than in the general population. These patients may develop arrhythmias that depend on the extra- and intracellular concentrations of potassium. ECG findings, particularly the QT interval and its dispersion (QTd) and the QTc (QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Bazett's formula) and its dispersion (QTcd), may be direct indicators of the risk of developing arrhythmia.

Methods. Our cohort comprised 28 patients who were dialysed for 3.5–4 h three times per week, first with haemodiafiltration with a constant potassium concentration (HDF) in the dialysis bath then with haemodiafiltration with variable concentrations of potassium (HDFk). ECGs were done at different time intervals: at the start of dialysis (T0), at 15 (T15), 45 (T45), 90 (T90) and 120 min (T120) after the beginning of the session, and at the end of treatment (Tend). ECG-derived data (QT, QTd, QTc and QTcd) were measured. At the same time points, plasma electrolytes, intra-erythrocytic potassium and the electrical membrane potential at rest (REMP) of the erythrocytic membrane were measured.

Results. Plasma potassium concentration diminished more gradually in HDFk than in HDF, the difference being statistically significant at T15 and T45 (P<0.05), and T90 (P<0.01). The intra-erythrocytic potassium concentration remained constant throughout the observation period. In both HDF and HDFk, REMP was lower at all points after T0 (P<0.05), but the reduction was greater and more significant in HDF than in HDFk at T15 and T120 (P<0.05). ECG revealed a statistically significant diminution in HDFk vs HDF in the measures of dispersion of QT and QTc at T15, T90, T120 and Tend (P<0.01) and of QTcd at T45 (P<0.05). The mean of QTd, adjusted for plasma potassium, increased over time in HDF with large alternate mean increase and decrease peaks and error intervals. In HDFk, instead, there was a progressive and constant diminution with minor error intervals. QTcd adjusted for plasma potassium had the same trend. A marked difference was found between the final values in standard HDF and those in HDFk.

Conclusions. HDF and HDFk have significantly different effects on QTc. ECG data demonstrate that the risk of arrhythmia could be lower, with a variable removal of potassium during haemodialysis. With HDF but not HDFk, hyperpolarization of the cell membrane is detected, and this could have a destabilizing effect on different types of cardiac cell, giving rise to retrograde circuits.

Keywords: acetate-free dialysis; arrhythmia; haemodiafiltration; haemodialysis; potassium; QT dispersion; QTc dispersion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Severi, E. Grandi, C. Pes, F. Badiali, F. Grandi, and A. Santoro
Calcium and potassium changes during haemodialysis alter ventricular repolarization duration: in vivo and in silico analysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 1378 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.