NDT Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2004
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(2):387-391; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh595
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 20 No. 2 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved
Original Article
Impact of graft failure on patient survival on dialysis: a comparison of transplant-naïve and post-graft failure mortality rates
1 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, 2 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and 3 Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Panduranga S. Rao, MD, 303 A, Simpson Memorial Building, 102 Observatory, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Email: spandu{at}umich.edu
Background. While the number of patients returning to dialysis after graft failure (GF) is increasing steadily, the impact of a failed kidney transplant on mortality among dialysis patients has not been studied well.
Methods. Data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register were utilized to examine the outcomes of an incident cohort of patients (n = 25 632) initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 1990 and 1998. Cox regression was used to compare covariate-adjusted mortality among five RRT categories: transplant-naïve dialysis, cadaveric primary renal transplant, living-donor primary renal transplant, post-GF dialysis and retransplant. RRT category-specific hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression and adjusting for age, sex, race, calendar period, primary renal diagnosis and comorbid conditions.
Results. Mortality among post-GF dialysis patients was approximately equal to that of transplant-naïve patients (HR = 0.90; P = 0.30) while the HR for retransplanted patients was significantly decreased, relative to the transplant-naïve group (HR = 0.35; P<0.01). Diabetes was found to be a significantly (P<0.01) stronger mortality risk factor among post-GF dialysis patients (HR = 3.71) compared with the transplant-naïve group (HR = 1.73). In the post-GF group, cardiovascular disease (HR = 1.66) and ‘other serious illness’ (HR = 2.07) were found to be much stronger risk factors for mortality than in the transplant-naïve group (HR = 1.33 and 1.43, respectively), although the differences failed to reach statistical significance.
Conclusions. These results suggest that transplant-naïve and post-GF dialysis patients have equivalent mortality risk and that mortality is significantly reduced upon retransplantation. In addition, the results highlight the importance of diabetes and, possibly, comorbid conditions as potential modifiable risk factors in the management of post-GF dialysis patients.
Keywords: dialysis; graft failure; outcome
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Messa, C. Ponticelli, and L. Berardinelli Coming back to dialysis after kidney transplant failure Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2738 - 2742. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Remuzzi, P. Cravedi, A. Perna, B. D. Dimitrov, M. Turturro, G. Locatelli, P. Rigotti, N. Baldan, M. Beatini, U. Valente, et al. Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplantation from Older Donors N. Engl. J. Med., January 26, 2006; 354(4): 343 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|