NDT Advance Access originally published online on September 27, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(12):2803-2811; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi099
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prevalence of co-morbidity in different European RRT populations and its effect on access to renal transplantation
1 ERAEDTA Registry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam, 2 Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden, The Netherlands, 3 The UK Renal Registry, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK, 4 Registro Lombardo Dialisi e Trapianto, "Ospedale UBOLDO", Cernusco S/N, Milano, Italy, 5 Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry (OEDTR), General Hospital of Wels, Wels, Austria, 6 Norwegian Renal Registry, Institute of Immunology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway and 7 Catalan Renal Registry (RMRC), Catalan Transplant Organisation, Catalan Health Service, Autonomous Government of Catalonia, Barcelona
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Vianda S. Stel, PhD, ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, J1b 113.1, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: v.s.stel{at}amc.uva.nl
Background. This study compared the prevalence of co-morbidity in patients starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) between European countries and further examined how co-morbidity affects access to transplantation.
Methods. In this ERA-EDTA registry special study, 17907 patients from Austria, Catalonia (Spain), Lombardy (Italy), Norway, and the UK (England/Wales) were included (19942001). Co-morbidity was recorded at the start of RRT.
Results. The prevalence of co-morbidity was: diabetes mellitus (DM) (primary renal disease and co-morbidity) 28%, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) 23%, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) 24%, cerebrovascular disease (CVD) 14% and malignancy 11%. With exception of malignancy, the prevalence of co-morbidity was highest in Austria, but differences were small among other countries. With exception of DM, males suffered more often from co-morbidity than females. In general, the percentage of haemodialysis was higher in patients with co-morbidity, but treatment modality differed substantially between countries. Using a Cox regression with adjustment for demographics, country, year of start and other co-morbidities, the presence of each of the co-morbid conditions made it less likely [RR; 95%CI] to receive a transplant within 4 years: DM [0.79; 0.700.88], IHD [0.59; 0.500.70], PVD [0.57; 0.490.67], CVD [0.49; 0.390.61], and malignancy [0.32; 0.240.42]. The age, gender and year of start adjusted relative risk [95%CI] to receive a renal transplant within 4 years ranged from 0.23 [0.190.27] for Lombardy (Italy) to 3.86 [3.364.45] for Norway (Austria = reference). These international differences existed for patients with and without co-morbidity.
Conclusions. The prevalence of co-morbidity was highest in Austria but differences were small among other countries. The access to a renal graft was most affected by the presence of malignancy and least affected by the presence of DM. International differences in access to transplantation were only partly due to co-morbid variability.
Keywords: co-morbidity; dialysis; epidemiology; registries; renal replacement therapy; renal transplantation
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. J. Jager and C. Zoccali Comorbidity data collection by renal registries - a remaining challenge Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 2, 2009; (2009) gfp257v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Morrone, S. Mazzaferro, D. Russo, F. Aucella, M. Cozzolino, M. G. Facchini, A. Galfre, F. Malberti, M. C. Mereu, M. Nordio, et al. Interaction between parathyroid hormone and the Charlson comorbidity index on survival of incident haemodialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 15, 2009; (2009) gfp170v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Panzetta, C. Basile, A. Santoro, E. Ancarani, S. Costantini, F. Guarnieri, and G. Verzetti Diabetics on dialysis in Italy: a nationwide epidemiological study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 3988 - 3995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Caskey, R. Steenkamp, and D. Ansell International comparison of UK registry data (Chapter 17) Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2007; 22(suppl_7): vii185 - vii193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|
R. T. Krediet 30 YEARS OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS DEVELOPMENT: THE PAST AND THE FUTURE Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S35 - S41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bayat, L. Frimat, N. Thilly, C. Loos, S. Briancon, and M. Kessler Medical and non-medical determinants of access to renal transplant waiting list in a French community-based network of care Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2900 - 2907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
