Skip Navigation

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2004 19(Supplement 6):vi3-vi7; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh1062
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pascual, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ortuño, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pascual, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ortuño, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 Suppl 6 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved

Renal function: defining long-term success

Julio Pascual, Roberto Marcén and Joaquín Ortuño

Department of Nephrology, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Julio Pascual, Department of Nephrology, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Ctra Colmenar Viejo Km9.1, Madrid 28034, Spain. Email: jpascual.hrc{at}salud.madrid.org

Abstract

One of the leading causes of late graft loss is chronic allograft nephropathy, characterized in part by deteriorating renal function. Registry data have demonstrated that renal function within the first year post-transplant is an important predictor of long-term transplant outcome, with serum creatinine concentrations ≤1.5 mg/dl at 6 or 12 months being associated with the highest rate of 5 year graft survival. These findings are supported by a retrospective, pooled analysis of two multicentre trials in the USA, as well as by our own data showing that serum creatinine concentrations may be predictive of long-term survival as early as 1 month post-transplant. Analysis of 216 renal transplantations carried out at our centre (1996–2000) using immunosuppressive therapy based on tacrolimus, corticosteroids and azathioprine (n = 51) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 70) vs ciclosporin microemulsion, azathioprine and corticosteroids (n = 95) showed that the best 3 year graft survival was achieved with tacrolimus/MMF therapy. While serum creatinine concentrations at this time point were similar for the tacrolimus and ciclosporin treatment groups (1.69 and 1.65 mg/dl, respectively), the proportion of patients with functioning grafts was significantly higher in the tacrolimus group (84 vs 67%, P = 0.007). Similar findings of improved renal function or graft outcomes with tacrolimus- vs ciclosporin-based therapy have been reported in other single-centre and multicentre trials and a USRDS registry survey. Accumulating data suggest that renal function compares well between tacrolimus-based and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing regimens. Consequently, the vast majority of renal transplant recipients maintain good long-term renal function with tacrolimus cornerstone immunosuppression without adopting CNI minimization or withdrawal strategies.

Keywords: chronic allograft nephropathy; calcineurin inhibitor elimination; graft survival; rejection; renal function; tacrolimus


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. R. Earnshaw, C. N. Graham, W. D. Irish, R. Sato, and M. A. Schnitzler
Lifetime Cost-Effectiveness of Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal After De Novo Renal Transplantation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 19(9): 1807 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.