Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aguilera, A.
Right arrow Articles by Selgas, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aguilera, A.
Right arrow Articles by Selgas, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: v46-v53
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 Suppl 5 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved

Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on inflammatory status in dialysis patients

Abelardo Aguilera and Rafael Selgas

Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Abelardo Aguilera, Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital de la Princesa, Diego de León 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain. Email: aguileraa{at}terra.es

Abstract

Under normal conditions, inflammatory status is regulated by a complex equilibrium between plasma and intracellular mediators. This equilibrium is broken in patients receiving dialysis, which can lead to chronic inflammation causing deleterious consequences on their organs and systems. During recent years, substances that can inhibit the effects of inflammation have been sought. The results of these investigations have produced controversial data on the effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) and, in this review, the effects of epoetin on the inflammatory status of dialysis patients are discussed. Aspects discussed include biomarkers of inflammation, and the relationships between epoetin, growth factors, endothelial dysfunction, endothelial fibrinolytic capacity, endothelial damage and oxidative stress. Relationships between epoetin and inflammation in non-uraemic patients are also addressed, as are associations between the malnutrition–inflammation–atherosclerosis syndrome and endothelial dysfunction. It is concluded that although epoetin administration in non-uraemic rats has been shown to have an anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effect, the mechanisms responsible for regulating inflammation in uraemia are very complex and partially contradictory. The changes in pro-thrombotic and pro-atherogenic factors in dialysis patients require further study to evaluate all the factors implicated in the atherogenic process.

Keywords: biomarker; dialysis; epoetin; inflammation; malnutrition–inflammation–atherosclerosis (MIA) syndrome; uraemia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.