Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schweitzer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Verres, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schweitzer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Verres, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: IV75-IV78
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 Suppl 4 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved

Donor–recipient interaction: the Heidelberg model of evaluation and consultation

Jochen Schweitzer, Maria Seidel-Wiesel and Rolf Verres

Department of Medical Psychology, University of Heidelberg Hospital, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Dr Jochen Schweitzer, Department of Medical Psychology, University of Heidelberg Hospital, Bergheimer Strasse 20, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany. Email: jochen_schweitzer-rothers{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de

Abstract

Background. In order to avoid psychological complications in living-donor transplantation, careful evaluation and consultation of the donor–recipient system is necessary. This article describes the Heidelberg consultation procedure before and after transplantation. This approach emphasizes close collaboration between physician and psychologist in joint interviews.

Methods. Consultations focus on family genogram, the history of the donation idea; stability and balance of relationship; expectations; hesitations and doubts; discussion of complications; previous hospital experiences; the offer to provide crisis intervention when needed.

Results. In 20% of all cases, unresolved problems appear. These include: unilaterally dependant relationships; unrealistic hopes for change; anxious avoidance to reflect complications; lack of medical information; risky health behaviour; negative experiences with hospitals. When properly consulted, half of these couples resign from transplantation.

Conclusions. Close physician–psychologist collaboration adds significant value to a ‘psychologist-only’ consultation. Discussing hesitations and concerns strengthens confidence in the professional transplantation system. Access to post-transplant consultation needs further improvement.

Keywords: couple and family consultation; living-donor kidney transplantation; problem cases; somato-psychological collaboration; worst case scenarios


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.