Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehrabi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Uhl, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehrabi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Uhl, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: IV1-IV5
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 Suppl 4 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved

Heidelberg's first experiences in establishing a living-donation liver transplantation programme

Arianeb Mehrabi, Peter Schemmer, Jan Schmidt, Peter Sauer, Helmut Friess, Thomas Kraus, Eike Martin*, Markus W. Büchler and Waldemar Uhl

Division of Liver Transplantation, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, and *Anaesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Prof. Dr med. W. Uhl, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, INF 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Email: waldemar_uhl{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de

Abstract

Background. Since indications for liver transplantation (LTx) have increased and the shortage of brain dead transplant organs continues, an increase in deaths related to extended waiting periods can be documented. Living-related LTx (LRLTx) is a good alternative that can help compensate the shortness of organs for transplantation and can reduce waiting periods and deaths related to a long waiting list. We started a LRLTx programme at the transplantation centre, Department of Surgery at the University of Heidelberg to increase our transplantation activities. In this article we present our primary experiences and protocol.

Methods. From September 2002 to June 2003, three LRLTx were performed. Indications in recipients were hepatocellular carcinoma in two cases and liver cirrhoses due to hepatitis B in one patient. Two patients received the right liver (segments V–VIII) of their donors. One patient received the complete liver collected as a Domino LTx. All liver transplants were performed without the use of a venous bypass.

Results. The peri- and post-operative courses of our donors were without complications, except for an infected intraabdominal bilioma, which was drained interventionally. The donors were fully able to work after the operation. The coordinative and logistical work should not be underestimated.

Conclusions. This therapy should only be offered and performed in centres with excellent expert knowledge in liver and transplantation surgery.

Keywords: domino transplantation; evaluation of living liver donor; living donation liver transplantation; living-related liver transplantation; preparation of living liver donor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.