Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Posada, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rivero Sanchez, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González-Posada, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rivero Sanchez, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: III57-III61
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 Suppl 3 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved

Impact of diabetes mellitus on kidney transplant recipients in Spain

Jose Manuel González-Posada1, Domingo Hernández1, Beatriz Bayés Genís2, Javier García Perez3 and Manuel Rivero Sanchez4

1 Nephrology Unit, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain, 2 Nephrology Unit, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain, 3 Nephrology Unit, Hospital Virgen de la Candelaria, Sta Cruz de Tenerife, Spain and 4 Nephrology Unit, Hospital Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Jose Manuel González-Posada, Nephrology Unit, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain. Email: jmgposada{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Background. The increasing prevalence of pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM) and especially the incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a disturbing tendency with far-reaching health and cost implications. We assessed the factors associated with PTDM and the impact of either condition on death-censored graft and patient survival.

Methods. We studied 3365 adult kidney allograft recipients transplanted in 1990, 1994 and 1998, whose graft was functioning after 1 year of follow-up. Three groups were considered: Group I (DM; N = 156), Group II (PTDM; N = 251) and Group III (non-diabetic; N = 2958).

Results. Group I patients had been dialysed for shorter periods and received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) therapy more frequently during follow-up than the other groups (P<0.001). Mean age, body weight and body mass index (BMI) were greater in Group II patients than the other groups (P<0.001). Group II showed lower rejection rates than Group III (P<0.01). Risk factors for developing PTDM were recipient age > 60 years (OR = 2.24; P<0.001), female recipient (OR = 1.5; P<0.005), recipient weight > 65 kg (OR = 1.77; P<0.002), BMI > 25 kg/m2 (OR = 1.6; P<0.04) or > 30 kg/m2 (OR = 2.92; P<0.005), and tacrolimus-based therapy (OR = 1.48; P<0.05). Of note, the use of Sandimmune® vs Neoral® had a protective effect (OR = 0.7; P<0.01). Using Cox's proportional hazards analysis, DM correlated with reduced death-censored graft survival (RR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.14–2.47; P<0.008), while PTDM correlated with reduced patient survival (RR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.05–2.27; P<0.02).

Conclusions. One year after transplantation, DM was associated with a decrease in death-censored graft survival, while PTDM was an independent negative predictor of patient survival after kidney transplantation. New strategies to improve outcome are needed.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; kidney transplantation; survival


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
P. Iglesias and J. J Diez
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists in renal disease.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 154(5): 613 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.