Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González Molina, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez Algarra, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González Molina, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez Algarra, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: III52-III56
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 Suppl 3 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved

Effect of the immunosuppressive treatment on long-term renal graft survival

Miguel González Molina1, Eugenia Sola1, Mercedes Cabello1, Carmen García2, Enrique Luna2 and Gabriel Rodriguez Algarra3

1 Division of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain, 2 Division of Nephrology, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain and 3 Division of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Miguel Gonzalez Molina, Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Carlos Haya, Avenida de Carlos Haya, S/N, 29016 Málaga, Spain. Email: cotraspa.hch.sspa{at}juntadeandalucia.es

Abstract

Background. Although new immunosuppressive agents have improved the results of renal transplants (RTs), long-term graft loss remains high. We evaluated the impact of different immunosuppressive regimens on patient and graft survival.

Methods. Data from 3365 patients receiving cadaver RTs in Spain during the years 1990, 1994 and 1998 were retrospectively analysed. All data were entered into a specially designed database. Graft and patient survival rates were estimated by the Cox regression method and results expressed as percentage survival. A maximum-likelihood estimate of the projected graft half-life (median value) was calculated by Weibull regression.

Results. In 1990 graft and patient survival differed significantly from the other treatment years (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.0101, respectively). The risk of graft loss was significantly higher for cyclosporine (CsA), prednisone (P) and azathioprine (Az) than for CsA + P, which in turn was higher than for CsA + P plus polyclonal antibodies [antilymphocyte globulin (ALG)/antithymocyte globulin (ATG)]. Risk of patient death was also significantly higher for CsA + P + Az than for CsA + P. No significant differences between treatment groups were found in graft and patient survival for 1994 and 1998. The projected median graft life for patients with the most used immunosuppressive regimen for each year was 12.9 years for CsA + P + Az and 15.6 years for CsA + P plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

Conclusions. Triple therapy with Az in 1990 and 1994 and with MMF in 1998 were the most frequently used immunosuppressive regimens in the Spanish kidney transplant population. The best results were seen after induction therapy with polyclonal antibodies.

Keywords: azathioprine; cyclosporine; graft and patient survival; mycophenolate mofetil; polyclonal antibodies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.