Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Serón, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rengel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Serón, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rengel, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: III43-III46
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 Suppl 3 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved

Early post-transplant renal allograft function between 1990 and 1998 in Spain

Daniel Serón1, Pablo Gómez Ullate2, José Antonio Gutierrez-Colón3, Ildefonso Lampreabe2, Juan Carlos Ruiz-Millán4 and Manuel Rengel5

1 Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, c/ Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain, 2 Servicio Nefrología, Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao, Spain, 3 Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain, and 4 Hospital Universitario de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain and 5 Hospital General Gregorio Marañón, Spain

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Daniel Serón, MD, Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, c/ Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain. Email: 17664dsm{at}comb.es

Abstract

Background. The last decade has witnessed a sustained improvement of renal allograft survival that is partly explained by a better preservation of renal allograft function. This study describes time-dependent modifications of serum creatinine (SCr) during the first year after transplantation in the last decade in Spain and characterizes the predictive value of SCr on death-censored graft survival.

Methods. A total of 3365 adult patients transplanted in 1990 (n = 824), 1994 (n = 1075) and 1998 (n = 1466) with a functioning graft after the first year were included. Renal function deterioration during the first year was expressed as the difference between SCr at 1 year and SCr at 3 months.

Results. Despite the projected renal allograft half-life, estimation was significantly higher in 1998 than in 1990 (17.7 vs 15.4 years, P = 0.007), the SCr levels at 3 months were significantly lower in 1990 (1.59±0.64) than in 1998 (1.65±0.66). While SCr tended to worsen during the first year in 1990 (0.05±0.64) it improved in 1998 (–0.003±0.48), P = 0.0001. The following variables were significantly associated with SCr at 3 months: donor age and sex, cause of death, recipient sex, time on dialysis, cold ischaemia time, delayed graft function, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection and reintervention for any reason. Renal function deterioration during the first year was associated with the presence of acute rejection and hepatitis C virus antibodies in the recipient.

Conclusions. Despite poorer renal function at 3 months in 1998 than in 1990, renal allograft survival has improved in Spain between 1990 and 1998. This result is partly explained by a slower deterioration of renal function during the first year of follow-up.

Keywords: acute rejection; creatinine clearance; hepatitis C virus antibodies; kidney transplant; serum creatinine; survival


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Moreso and J. M. Grinyo
Graft dysfunction and cardiovascular risk--an unholy alliance
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 699 - 702.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.