Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sola, R.
Right arrow Articles by Osuna, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sola, R.
Right arrow Articles by Osuna, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: III32-III37
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 Suppl 3 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved

The influence of delayed graft function

Ricard Sola1, Antonio Alarcón2, Carlos Jiménez3 and Antonio Osuna4

1 Nephrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain, 2 Nephrology Department, Hospital Sondureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 3 Nephrology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain and 4 Nephrology Service, Hospital Univ. Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Ricard Sola, MD, Nephrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain. Email: rsola{at}fundacio-puigvert.es

Abstract

We study the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) in a group of 3365 renal transplant recipient patients from various Spanish centres, its clinical consequences, and the evolution in time (transplants performed in 1990, 1994 and 1998) of the factors that determine its presence. The incidence of DGF remained constant in the 3 years studied (30.4, 30.8 and 29.2%, respectively) when contrasting the following factors involved in the establishment of DGF were studied: body mass of recipient, donor age, non-heart beating donation, type of replacement treatment in the pre-transplant period, time of vascular anastomosis and time of cold ischaemia. DGF was not associated with graft or patient survival. In the transplants performed with elderly donors, the cold ischaemia time was associated with greater incidence of DGF, and the latter with less survival of the graft when censored for death. The presence of DGF was significantly associated with acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, worse renal function and arterial hypertension at 3 months post-transplantation. In conclusion, the incidence of DGF remained stable in our patients over the years studied and, although not directly, it can affect graft survival as it is associated with acute rejection, arterial hypertension and worse renal graft function. A shortening of ischaemia times may reduce the incidence of DGF and improve transplant results.

Keywords: chronic allograft nephropathy; delayed graft function; kidney transplantation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. Johnston, P. O'Kelly, S. Spencer, J. Donohoe, J. J. Walshe, D. M. Little, D. Hickey, and P. J. Conlon
Reduced graft function (with or without dialysis) vs immediate graft function--a comparison of long-term renal allograft survival
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2270 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.