Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on April 6, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/7/1856    most recent
gfh247v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, S. S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, S. S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: 1856-1861
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 No. 7 © ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Original Article

Centre-specific variation in renal transplant outcomes in Canada

S. Joseph Kim1, Douglas E. Schaubel2, John R. Jeffery3 and Stanley S. A. Fenton1

1 Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA and 3 Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Stanley S. A. Fenton, Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, 13th floor, Eaton Wing North, Room 232, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4. Email: stanley.fenton{at}uhn.on.ca

Background. The ‘centre effect’ has accounted for significant variation in renal allograft outcomes in the United States and Europe. To determine whether similar variation exists in Canada, we analysed mortality and graft failure (GF) rates among Canadian end-stage renal disease patients who received a renal allograft from 1988 to 1997 (n = 5082) across 20 transplant centres.

Methods. Patients were followed from the date of transplantation to the time of GF and/or death. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate mortality and GF hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for relevant covariates, including centre volume. Centre-specific HRs were derived by comparing each centre's outcome rates against all others.

Results. Twenty centres were included in the analysis. There was significant centre-specific variation in recipient and transplant characteristics (e.g. age, diabetes mellitus, donor source and centre volume) as well as covariate-adjusted facility-specific outcome rates. Facility-specific HRs for GF (including death with a functioning graft) ranged from 0.51 to 1.77, while mortality HRs (including death beyond GF) showed a similar spread (0.44–1.84). These HRs represent a 3- to 4-fold difference in transplant outcomes among the 20 centres studied. Centres performing less than 200 transplants over the study period were associated with lower graft and patient survival.

Conclusions. These findings demonstrate significant centre-specific variation in the success of renal transplantation in Canada. Further studies are needed to elucidate the causes of this variation, with the goal of developing strategies to minimize the centre effect and ensure the best possible outcomes for all renal transplant recipients.

Keywords: Canada; centre-specific variation; outcome; registry; renal transplantation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.