Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wight, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lennon, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wight, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lennon, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: 963-968
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 No. 4 © ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Original Article

Variation in cadaveric organ donor rates in the UK

Jeremy Wight1, Michael Jakubovic2, Stephen Walters1, Ravi Maheswaran3, Paul White3 and Veronica Lennon4

1School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) and 3Public Health GIS Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 4Sheffield Kidney Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield and 2Eastern Wakefield Primary Care Trust, Castleford, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Jeremy Wight, Section of Public Health Medicine, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK. Email: j.p.wight{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Background. Considerable variation exists in the organ donation rate between kidney retrieval areas (KRAs) within the UK. The causes for this are unknown. This study examines whether or not observed variations are correlated with various possible explanatory factors.

Methods. A geographical study involving Poisson regression analysis was carried out of all 21 KRAs in the UK in 1999 and 2000, with donor rate as dependent variable, and the following independent variables: road traffic accident, intracerebral haemorrhage and other trauma death rates; intensive care unit (ICU) bed numbers; co-location of transplant and neurosurgical units; population ethnicity; proportion of the population on the organ donor register; transplant coordinator numbers; and transplant unit numbers. Main outcome measures were: donor rate in each KRA; strength of association between independent and dependent variables; and magnitude of changes in the donor rate associated with changes in independent variables.

Results. The donor rate varied between eight and 27.4 donors per million population per year. There was an association between donor rate and general ICU bed numbers (more beds associated with a higher donor rate), but this was of borderline statistical significance (P = 0.065). However, the donor rate was negatively associated (P = 0.02) with neurosurgical ICU bed numbers (more beds, fewer donors) and the proportion of the population from minority ethnic communities. There was no statistically significant association with the other independent variables.

Conclusions. There is significant variation in the organ donor rate between different parts of the UK. More research is needed to explore the counter-intuitive association between neurosurgical ICU beds and donations, and to determine the remaining causes of the observed variation.

Keywords: organ donation; transplantation; variation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
K. Barber, S. Falvey, C. Hamilton, D. Collett, and C. Rudge
Potential for organ donation in the United Kingdom: audit of intensive care records
BMJ, May 13, 2006; 332(7550): 1124 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.