Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: 644-651
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 No. 3 (c) ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Original Article

The assessment of fluid status in haemodialysis patients: usefulness of the Doppler echocardiographic parameters

Chih-Cheng Wu1, Yao-Ping Lin2, Wen-Chung Yu1, Wen-Shin Lee1, Tsei-Lieh Hsu1, Philip Yu-An Ding1 and Chen-Huan Chen1

1Division of Cardiology and 2Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and the Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Chen-Huan Chen, MD, 201 Shih-Pai Road, Sec. 2, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Email: chench{at}vghtpe.gov.tw

Background. In end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing regular haemodialysis (HD), the maintenance of fluid status within an optimal range is critical. We therefore examined the role of Doppler echocardiographic parameters in the assessment of fluid status in these patients.

Methods. Three study groups were enrolled: 40 healthy volunteers (NTNR), 40 HD patients who were normotensive without receiving antihypertensive agents (NTHD) and 38 HD patients who had remained hypertensive (HTHD) despite antihypertensive treatment. Measurements of Doppler echocardiographic parameters from pulmonary vein (PV) and mitral inflow (Mi) were performed on a non-dialysis day. Extracellular water as a percentage of body weight (ECW%) and pre-dialysis mean blood pressure (BDMBP) were references for fluid status. The best Doppler parameter for fluid status assessment identified from the study groups was then tested in another validation groups (38 NTHD and 38 HTHD).

Results. Among all of the PV and Mi parameters, the S/D ratio (peak systolic velocity divided by peak diastolic velocity) was correlated with fluid status parameters best (with ECW%, r = –0.49, P<0.001; with BDMBP, r = –0.51, P<0.001). The correlations were independent of age, sex and Mi parameters. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated that an S/D ratio >1.33 had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 77% in identifying NTHD patients. When the same criterion was applied to the validation groups, the positive predictive value was 64% and the negative predictive value was 86%.

Conclusion. The Doppler-derived S/D ratio is a potentially useful marker for the assessment of fluid status in HD patients.

Keywords: dry weight; echocardiography; fluid status; haemodialysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. Toprak and M. Cirit
Investigating the volume status before contrast nephropathy studies
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 464 - 464.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. F. Drager, L. Andrade, and A. C. Seguro
Reply
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 464 - 466.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.