Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ponikvar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ponikvar, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: V63-V67
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Blood purification in the intensive care unit

Rafael Ponikvar

Dialysis Center Zaloska, Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia

The cornerstone of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) in our hospital, was intermittent bicarbonate dialysis with synthetic membranes, prescribed daily for anuric patients. Filling of the extracorporeal circuit with 5% human albumin or saline solution before the start of dialysis, as well as hypernatraemic dialysis with profiling, lower dialysate temperature and higher ionized calcium concentration have been used to prevent harmful hypotensive episodes either at the start or during dialysis. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in adults was used primarily for anuric, hypotensive patients who might not tolerate standard haemodialysis. All newborns and infants in whom peritoneal dialysis was not possible were treated by continuous procedures. Sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) or extended daily dialysis (EDD) were an acceptable compromise between intermitent haemodialysis and CRRT. However, in our opinion, the most promising approach to intensive care unit (ICU) patients with ARF would be the combination of CRRT in the anuric patient followed by intermittent daily dialysis thereafter. Although the mortality rate of ARF patients was as high as 88% in adults and 73% in small children due to the lack of reliable criteria for the selection of patients with poor or good prognosis, aggressive treatment for all patients who needed dialysis was recommended recently. Apheresis has dramatically improved the prognosis and outcome in patients with myasthenia gravis, Guillain–Barré syndrome, Goodpasture syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The mortality rate of patients with septic shock and fulminant hepatic failure was still very high, and the role of apheresis and dialysis, in spite of some encouraging results, remains controversial.

Keywords: acute renal failure; apheresis; dialysis; ICU; plasma exchange

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Dr Rafael Ponikvar, Head, Dialysis Center, Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: rafael.ponikvar{at}kclj.si


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.