Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vuong, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Joles, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vuong, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Joles, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 1485-1492
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Hypoalbuminaemia enhances the renal vasoconstrictor effect of lysophosphatidylcholine

Thi Danh Vuong, Branko Braam, Nel Willekes-Koolschijn, Peter Boer, Hein A. Koomans and Jaap A. Joles

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Jaap A. Joles, DVM, PhD (F03.226), Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, POB 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: j.a.joles{at}med.uu.nl

Background. Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) causes vascular dysfunction in vitro. Lipoprotein LPC is increased in hypoalbuminaemia. Albumin binds LPC and restores LPC-induced abnormalities. We hypothesized that in vivo LPC impairs blood flow more in hypoalbuminaemia than in normoalbuminaemia.

Methods. Increasing concentrations of LPC were infused intra-renally in Nagase analbuminaemic rats (NAR) and Sprague–Dawley rats (controls).

Results. Intra-renal LPC (0.1 µmol/min, 20 min) reduced renal blood flow (RBF) more (P < 0.01) in NAR (from 8.3 ± 0.3 to 4.0 ± 1.1) than in controls (from 7.7 ± 0.7 to 5.8 ± 0.5 ml/min/g kidney). Lysophosphatidylethanolamine had no effect. After stopping LPC, RBF recovery was delayed in NAR [median 90 (range: 70–90) vs 45 min (40–60), P < 0.01]. Intravenous bovine serum albumin (BSA) prevented LPC-induced vasoconstriction in both strains. Prolonging LPC for 60 min delayed recovery of RBF. In this setting, intra-renal BSA completely restored RBF in 75 min (30–90), while intra-renal saline over 75 min only resulted in 33 ± 13% recovery (P < 0.01). Baseline renal LPC content was unchanged in NAR. However, intra-renal LPC infusion doubled renal LPC content in NAR, but had no effect in controls.

Conclusions. In NAR, baseline RBF and renal LPC content are normal. However, exposure of NAR to LPC results in much more vasoconstriction and accumulation of LPC than in normoalbuminaemia. Addition of albumin prevents and restores LPC-induced vasoconstriction.

Keywords: albumin; analbuminaemic rat; lysophosphatidylcholine; hypoalbuminaemia; renal blood flow


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. M. Bevers, E. E. van Faassen, T. D. Vuong, Z. Ni, P. Boer, H. A. Koomans, B. Braam, N. D. Vaziri, and J. A. Joles
Low albumin levels increase endothelial NO production and decrease vascular NO sensitivity
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3443 - 3449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
F. Huang, P. V. Subbaiah, O. Holian, J. Zhang, A. Johnson, N. Gertzberg, and H. Lum
Lysophosphatidylcholine increases endothelial permeability: role of PKC{alpha} and RhoA cross talk
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): L176 - L185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.