Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kosch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hausberg, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kosch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hausberg, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 1370-1375
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Dialysis filter type determines the acute effect of haemodialysis on endothelial function and oxidative stress

Markus Kosch1,, Andrea Levers1, Manfred Fobker2, Michael Barenbrock1, Roland M. Schaefer1, Karl-Heinz Rahn1 and Martin Hausberg1

1 Department of Internal Medicine D (Nephrology) and 2 Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

Background. Endothelial function of large arteries is impaired in chronic haemodialysis patients and oxidative stress due to the dialysis procedure has been suggested as a causal factor. However, it is not clear whether different types of dialysis membranes affect endothelial function differently. Therefore we determined endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery as well as markers of oxidative stress immediately before and after haemodialysis (HD) with either a cellulosic cuprophane or a synthetic polysulphone dialyser in a blinded, randomized, cross-over study.

Methods. Twelve haemodialysis patients (age 55±3 years, time on dialysis 20±2 months, mean fluid change -1782±21 ml, systolic/diastolic blood pressure 139/75 mmHg) were included. Using a multi-gate-pulsed Doppler system (echo-tracking device) brachial artery FMD and nitroglycerine-induced, endothelium-independent vasodilatation (NMD) were measured. Patients were randomized to HD with either a polysulphone or a cuprophane membrane and were crossed over to the other filter. Investigators were blinded to the type of membrane used. Serum concentrations of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) and {alpha}-tocopherol as markers of oxidative stress were measured before and after each dialysis session.

Results. Data are given as mean±SEM. Treatment with polysulphone filter HD did not significantly affect FMD (baseline 9.3±2.0% vs after HD 9.6±1.8%). After dialysis with a cuprophane membrane FMD decreased from 9.4±2.1 to 7.4±1.8% (P<0.05). NMD was not significantly affected by HD irrespective of the membrane material used. Serum levels of oxLDL were not changed by either treatment; however, {alpha}-tocopherol concentrations fell significantly after dialysis with the cuprophane filter (baseline 18.0±2.3 after HD 16.6±1.3 µg/ml, P<0.05), while {alpha}-tocopherol levels remained unchanged when the polysulphone membrane was used.

Conclusions. The type of dialysis filter membrane determines the acute effect of haemodialysis on arterial endothelial function. Differences in biocompatibility and oxidative stress may account for the observed differential effects, since the decrease of FMD after dialysis with a cellulosic cuprophane membrane—but not with a synthetic polysulphone membrane—was associated with a reduction in serum vitamin E.

Keywords: cuprophane; endothelial function; flow-mediated vasodilatation; haemodialysis; oxidative stress; polysulphone

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Markus Kosch, MD, Department of Medicine D, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, D-48129 Münster, Germany. Email: koschm{at}uni-muenster.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
A Kazory and E A Ross
Ultrafiltration for decompensated heart failure: renal implications
Heart, July 1, 2009; 95(13): 1047 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
P. E. Westerweel, I. E. Hoefer, P. J. Blankestijn, P. de Bree, D. Groeneveld, O. van Oostrom, B. Braam, H. A. Koomans, and M. C. Verhaar
End-stage renal disease causes an imbalance between endothelial and smooth muscle progenitor cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): F1132 - F1140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C.-C. Wu, J.-S. Chen, W.-M. Wu, T.-N. Liao, P. Chu, S.-H. Lin, C.-H. Chuang, and Y.-F. Lin
Myeloperoxidase serves as a marker of oxidative stress during single haemodialysis session using two different biocompatible dialysis membranes
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1134 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.