Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lok, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, R. M.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lok, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, R. M.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 1174-1180
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Reducing vascular access morbidity: a comparative trial of two vascular access monitoring strategies

Charmaine E. Lok1,, Cynthia Bhola1, Ruth Croxford2 and Robert M.A. Richardson1

1 Department of Medicine, University Health Network, The Toronto General Hospital and 2 Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada

Background. Thrombosis is the primary cause of access failure in polytetrafluoroethylene grafts and arteriovenous fistulas. It can lead to significant patient and access morbidity and mortality, and is difficult to prevent medically. Intervention is largely limited to maximizing access patency by detecting culprit lesions early and intervening with angioplasty or surgical revision. The most efficacious monitoring strategy is undetermined.

Methods. This 3 year prospective study took advantage of a change in monitoring strategy used in a large dialysis centre to compare the efficacy of two methods used to monitor grafts and fistulas in order to prevent access thrombosis. Accesses were monitored using Duplex ultrasonography in year 1, while the saline ultrasound dilution technique (Transonic) became the primary monitoring strategy in year 3 (year 2 was a transition year). Risk factors for thrombosis were determined using multivariate survival analysis, and the performance of Duplex ultrasonography and Transonic monitoring was assessed.

Results. A total of 303 656 access days at risk were assessed, with 344, 385 and 425 accesses in years 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The total thrombosis rate was 1.01/1000 access days in year 1 compared with 0.66/1000 access days in year 3. This was accomplished despite a reduction in procedure rates of 55% for angiograms, 13% for angioplasties and 31% for thrombolysis.

Conclusion. Low flow rates detected using Transonic monitoring were associated with increased thrombosis, while stenosis detected using Duplex ultrasonography was not a strong predictor of incipient thrombosis; however, these different access characteristics were compared using monitoring techniques that may be ideal in different clinical situations.

Keywords: access monitoring; fistulas; grafts; thrombosis; ultrasound dilution

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Charmaine E. Lok, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, The Toronto General Hospital, 11 EN-216, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4 Canada. Email: charmaine.lok{at}uhn.on.ca


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Ponce, A. Mateus, and L. Santos
Anatomical correlation of a well-functioning access graft for haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 535 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Tessitore, V. Bedogna, A. Poli, W. Mantovani, G. Lipari, E. Baggio, G. Mansueto, and A. Lupo
Adding access blood flow surveillance to clinical monitoring reduces thrombosis rates and costs, and improves fistula patency in the short term: a controlled cohort study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 3578 - 3584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
E. Wijnen, F. M. van der Sande, J. H. M. Tordoir, J. P. Kooman, and K. M. L. Leunissen
Effect of online haemodialysis vascular access flow evaluation and pre-emptive intervention on the frequency of access thrombosis
NDT Plus, October 1, 2008; 1(5): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
E. Schuman, A. Ronfeld, C. Barclay, and P. Heinl
Comparison of Clinical Assessment With Ultrasound Flow for Hemodialysis Access Surveillance
Arch Surg, December 1, 2007; 142(12): 1129 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
C. E. Lok
Fistula First Initiative: Advantages and Pitfalls
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2007; 2(5): 1043 - 1053.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
G. A. Knoll, P. S. Wells, D. Young, S. L. Perkins, R. M. Pilkey, J. J. Clinch, and M. A. Rodger
Thrombophilia and the Risk for Hemodialysis Vascular Access Thrombosis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2005; 16(4): 1108 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Wiese and B. Nonnast-Daniel
Colour Doppler ultrasound in dialysis access
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1956 - 1963.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.