Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falcão Pedrosa Costa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jorgetti, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falcão Pedrosa Costa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jorgetti, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 743-749
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Effects of calcitriol on parathyroid function and on bone remodelling in secondary hyperparathyroidism

André Falcão Pedrosa Costa, Luciene Machado dos Reis, Melani Custódio Ribeiro, Rosa Maria Affonso Moysés and Vanda Jorgetti

Nephrology Department, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Background. Secondary hyperparathyroidism (2HPT) develops in chronic renal failure due to disturbances of calcium, phosphorus and vitamin D metabolism. It is characterized by high turnover bone disease and an altered calcium–parathyroid hormone (PTH) relationship. Calcitriol has been widely used for the treatment of 2HPT. However, it remains controversial whether calcitriol is capable of inducing changes of the calcium–PTH curve. The aim of the present study was to examine this issue and to determine the effect of calcitriol on bone remodelling in patients with severe 2HPT.

Methods. We evaluated 16 chronic haemodialysis patients with severe 2HPT (PTH 899±342 pg/ml). Each patient underwent a dynamic parathyroid function test (by infusion of calcium gluconate and sodium citrate) and a bone biopsy before and after a 6 month period of i.v. calcitriol therapy (CTx).

Results. After treatment, eight patients were identified as calcitriol responders and the other eight as non-responders, based on plasma PTH level (<300 pg/ml for responders and >300 pg/ml for non-responders). The first group had higher plasma 25OHD3 levels (39±8 vs 24±7 ng/ml, P<0.005). As to the calcium–PTH curve, we found differences in slope (-12.7±5.2 vs -21.7±11.4, P=0.05), basal/maximum PTH ratio (48.8±14.9 vs 71.05±20.1%, P=0.01) and time to achieve hypocalcaemia (79.0±13.5 vs 94.3±13.7 min, P<0.001). Initial histomorphometric parameters did not allow identification of the different groups. After the 6-month CTx, alterations in the calcium–PTH curve were clearly seen in responders [a drop in maximum PTH (from 1651±616 to 938±744 pg/ml, P<0.05) and minimum PTH (from 163±75.4 to 102.2±56.7 pg/ml, P<0.005)], associated with an increase in minimum/basal PTH ratio (from 23.3±11.6 to 34.5±20.4%, P<0.05) and maximum calcium (from 0.99±0.07 to 1.1±0.09 mmol/l, P<0.05). Set point and slope were not altered after calcitriol treatment, in responders (set point=1.17±0.08 vs 1.15±0.1 mmol/l, ns; slope=-12.7±5.2 vs -12.9±9.3, ns) or non-responders (set point=1.21±0.05 vs 1.21±0.2 mmol/l, ns; slope=-21.7±11.4 vs -17.3±8.4, ns). Bone formation parameters were reduced in all patients [osteoid surface (OS/BS)=from 57.1±21.6 to 41.6±26%, P<0.05 for responders, and from 76.7±12 to 47.1±15%, P<0.001 in non-responders], but non-responders had increased bone resorption [eroded surface (ES/BS)=7.1±3.4 vs 16.6±4.9, P<0.05].

Conclusion. Calcitriol had non-uniform effects on parathyroid function and bone remodelling in uraemic patients. Non-responders exhibited a decoupled remodelling process that could further influence mineral balance or possibly also bone structure. To avoid such undesirable effects, early identification of non-responder patients is crucial when using calcitriol for the treatment of 2HPT.

Keywords: bone biopsy; calcitriol; calcium; histomorphometry; PTH; secondary hyperparathyroidism

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Vanda Jorgetti, Av Dr Arnaldo 455, 30 andar, sala 3342, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01246-903, Brazil. Email: vandajor{at}usp.br


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
G. M. Chertow, S. Blumenthal, S. Turner, M. Roppolo, L. Stern, E. M. Chi, J. Reed, and on behalf of the CONTROL Investigators
Cinacalcet Hydrochloride (Sensipar) in Hemodialysis Patients on Active Vitamin D Derivatives with Controlled PTH and Elevated Calcium x Phosphate
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2006; 1(2): 305 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.