Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, K.-U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, K.-U.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 48-55
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Anaemia of critical illness – implications for understanding and treating rHuEPO resistance

Kai-Uwe Eckardt

Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

The prospect of a shortage of blood for transfusions, increasing awareness of the adverse effects of transfusions, and the availability of human recombinant erythropoietin (rHuEPO) have stimulated interest in the pathogenesis of the anaemia of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. As in the anaemia of chronic illness or chronic renal failure (CRF), the anaemia of ICU patients is a multifactorial process. Blood loss, inappropriately low erythropoietin production, reduced red cell lifespan, reduced iron availability, and inhibition of erythropoiesis by cytokines all contribute to the anaemia of critical illness, although the contributions of the various elements differ depending on the disease aetiology. Evidence is accumulating that use of rHuEPO can induce stimulation of erythropoiesis in critical illness, but at doses that are usually several-fold higher than those used to define resistance to rHuEPO in the current guidelines for the management of anaemia in CRF. Available data suggest that these high doses are well tolerated, at least in the short term. These observations, as well as demonstrating the potential benefits of rHuEPO therapy in critically ill patients, have practical implications for non-ICU patients with CRF who do not respond sufficiently to the usual doses of rHuEPO. Although the risk–benefit ratio relationship for very high doses of rHuEPO needs further consideration, demonstration of rHuEPO efficacy in critical illness should result in a re-evaluation of the ‘dose–response relationship’ for rHuEPO in patients with less acute and severe illness, including CRF patients hyporesponsive to current dosing regimens.

Keywords: anaemia; chronic renal failure; critical illness; erythropoietin; resistance

Notes

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany. Email: kai\|[hyphen]\|uwe.eckardt{at}charite.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.