Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannata-Andía, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Martín, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cannata-Andía, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Martín, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 9-12
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association



The clinical impact of aluminium overload in renal failure

Jorge B. Cannata-Andía and Jose L. Fernández-Martín

Servicio de Metabolismo Oseo y Mineral, Instituto Reina Sofía de Investigación, Hospital Central de Asturias, Julian Clavería S/N, Oviedo 33006, Spain

Abstract

Chronic aluminium exposure and toxicity related to aluminium absorption and contaminated dialysis fluid continue to be a problem for many patients with renal failure, particularly in South America and in some developing countries. The two most prevalent sources of aluminium in this population are water used to prepare dialysate and aluminium-containing phosphate binders. Of particular concern is the effect of aluminium at the level of the bone, the haematopoietic system and the brain. Here we focus mainly on the adverse effects of aluminium on bone, the preferred organ of aluminium accumulation in the body. Unfortunately, aluminium has a cumulative effect, thus even short-term exposure to aluminium in phosphate binders adds to the total load and may contribute to the risk of aluminium-related bone disease. Even a bone biopsy does not allow a precise determination of total bone aluminium content. We examine the mechanisms by which aluminium contributes to abnormal bone remodelling. Studies indicate that aluminium has a direct effect, inhibiting bone formation and resorption. There is also evidence for an indirect effect through the action of aluminium on parathyroid hormone synthesis and by its modulation of calcium activity. We discuss commonly used techniques for identifying aluminium load and review studies of chelation therapy as a method to lower aluminium load. It is apparent that aluminium overload has serious consequences for patients with chronic renal failure, yet this problem can be largely prevented by the use of aluminium-free phosphate binders. The deleterious effects on bone remodelling caused by chronic exposure to aluminium suggest that caution should be observed when using other metals as phosphate binders.

Keywords: aluminium; bone remodelling; desferrioxamine; phosphate binders

Notes

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Jorge B. Cannata-Andía, MD, Servicio de Metabolismo Oseo y Mineral, Instituto Reina Sofía de Investigación, Hospital Central de Asturias, Julian Clavería S/N, Oviedo 33006, Spain. Email: cannata{at}hca.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
H.-O. Hellstrom, K. Michaelsson, H. Mallmin, and B. Mjoberg
The aluminium content of bone, and mortality risk
Age Ageing, March 1, 2008; 37(2): 217 - 220.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. J. Schucker and K. E. Ward
Hyperphosphatemia and phosphate binders
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., November 15, 2005; 62(22): 2355 - 2361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.