Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by de Charro, F. Th.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by de Charro, F. Th.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 1655-1660
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Patient-related and centre-related factors influencing technique survival of peritoneal dialysis in The Netherlands

Roel M. Huisman1,, Martin G. M. Nieuwenhuizen2 and Frank Th. de Charro2

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands and 2 Renine Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Background. Although technique failure occurs relatively frequently in peritoneal dialysis (PD), few data have been published on differences in technique failure between centres.

Methods. Using data from RENINE, the comprehensive dialysis registry of The Netherlands, we analysed PD technique failure rates in the period 1994–1999, with life table methods and Cox multiple regression analysis. Patient age, sex, and the presence or absence of diabetes were included in the analysis, as well as time of initiation of PD and the following centre characteristics: number of PD patients treated in the centre and percentage of patients on PD.

Results. Technique failure was higher in older patients: 2-year technique survival was 75% in those younger than 45 years, 68% in the group aged 45–64 years, and 60% in those over 64 years (P<0.0001). Sex and diabetes made no difference in technique survival. Mean annual technique failure rates varied greatly between centres (10–59%) and correlated with the number of patients on PD in the centre (r=-0.396, P=0.009) and with the fraction of patients on PD (r=-0.410, P=0.006). Low technique survival rates occurred mainly in centres with less than 20 patients on PD: relative risk for technique failure 1.68 as compared with larger centres. Patients starting PD in the period 1997–1999 had better technique survival than those starting in 1994–1996 (P=0.001).

Conclusion. PD technique survival in The Netherlands has increased in recent years. Having less than 20 PD patients in a centre or having a small fraction of patients on PD carries an increased risk of technique failure. The variability in PD technique survival between centres indicates that in many centres further improvements should be possible.

Keywords: centre size; dialysis centres; dialysis registry; patient survival; peritoneal dialysis; technique survival

Correspondence and offprint requests to: R. M. Huisman, MD, University Hospital Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, PO Box 30.001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. Email: r.m.huisman{at}int.azg.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. K.-t. Li and K. M. Chow
Importance of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by nephrologists: practice makes perfect
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 3274 - 3276.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
B. Piraino, E. Minev, J. Bernardini, and F. H. Bender
DOES EXPERIENCE WITH PD MATTER?
Perit. Dial. Int., May 1, 2009; 29(3): 256 - 261.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
L. C. Plantinga, N. E. Fink, F. O. Finkelstein, N. R. Powe, and B. G. Jaar
ASSOCIATION OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CLINIC SIZE WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES
Perit. Dial. Int., May 1, 2009; 29(3): 285 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
B. Afolalu, L. Troidle, O. Osayimwen, J. Bhargava, J. Kitsen, and F. O. Finkelstein
TECHNIQUE FAILURE AND CENTER SIZE IN A LARGE COHORT OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS IN A DEFINED GEOGRAPHIC AREA
Perit. Dial. Int., May 1, 2009; 29(3): 292 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Tangri, D. Ansell, and D. Naimark
Predicting technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: comparing artificial neural networks and logistic regression
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2972 - 2981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. K.-T. Li and C.-C. Szeto
Success of the peritoneal dialysis programme in Hong Kong
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1475 - 1478.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. v. Biesen, N. Veys, N. Lameire, and R. Vanholder
Why less success of the peritoneal dialysis programmes in Europe?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1478 - 1481.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Viglino, L. Neri, S. Alloatti, G. Cabiddu, R. Cocchi, A. Limido, G. Marinangeli, R. Russo, U. Teatini, and F. P. Schena
Analysis of the factors conditioning the diffusion of peritoneal dialysis in Italy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3601 - 3605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Tangri, D. Ansell, and D. Naimark
Lack of a centre effect in UK renal units: application of an artificial neural network model
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 743 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.