Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kloppenburg, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kloppenburg, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 1628-1633
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

The contradiction of stable body mass despite low reported dietary energy intake in chronic haemodialysis patients

Wybe D. Kloppenburg, Paul E. de Jong and Roel M. Huisman

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Groningen University Institute for Drug Exploration (GUIDE), University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands

Background. Dietary energy intake (DEI) is reported to be below recommended values in a large proportion of stable chronic haemodialysis patients, while energy requirement appears not to be very different from that in healthy subjects. Nevertheless, body mass has often been reported to be stable over time. We hypothesized that underestimation of habitual DEI by self-reporting of food intake could explain the contradiction of a neutral energy balance despite an apparently insufficient DEI.

Methods. In a group of 38 adequately dialysed haemodialysis patients the values of self-reported DEI and body mass assessed by anthropometry were analysed over a 40-week study period. In the total group, body mass increased over time at a DEI of 29±5 kcal/kg of desirable body weight per day. Self-reported DEI was factored by an estimate of the patient's basal metabolic rate (BMR) to arrive at a DEI/BMR ratio. A total energy expenditure (TEE) of at least 1.27 times the BMR is presumed to be required to maintain body weight over time. A DEI that is lower than this minimum value of TEE in patients with stable body mass over time strongly suggests underreporting of habitual DEI.

Results. In 61% of the patients the DEI/BMR ratio was below 1.27. In these patients, body weight increased significantly over time, despite a DEI/BMR ratio of only 1.06±0.15. Body mass index correlated inversely with total DEI (r=-0.39, P<0.05) and the DEI/BMR ratio (r=-0.60, P<0.001), indicating that self-reported DEI was lowest in overweight patients.

Conclusions. These observations suggest that the contradiction of a stable body mass over time despite an apparently insufficient DEI in haemodialysis patients is mainly explained by an underestimation of habitual DEI from self-reported food intake.

Keywords: anthropometry; dialysis adequacy; diet records; dietary energy intake; haemodialysis; nutritional status

Correspondence and offprint requests to: W. D. Kloppenburg, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, PO Box 30.001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. Email: w.d.kloppenburg{at}int.azg.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. Yannakoulia, D. B. Panagiotakos, C. Pitsavos, E. Bathrellou, C. Chrysohoou, Y. Skoumas, and C. Stefanadis
Low Energy Reporting Related to Lifestyle, Clinical, and Psychosocial Factors in a Randomly Selected Population Sample of Greek Adults: The ATTICA Study
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2007; 26(4): 327 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.