Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillich, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Klehr, H. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gillich, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Klehr, H. U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 884-886
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Comparison of blood group versus HLA-dependent transplantation and its influence on donor kidney survival

Markus S. Gillich1,, Dirk Heimbach1, Georg Schoeneich1, Stefan C. Müller1 and Hans Ulrich Klehr2

1 Department of Urology and 2 Department of Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Background. The advantages of organ allocation based on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing are controversial. This evaluation compares the results of HLA-dependent and non-HLA-dependent allocation in the transplantation of donor kidneys.

Methods. Seventy-seven donor kidney pairs explanted locally between 1984 and 1994 were examined. One half of each pair was transplanted locally in Bonn on the basis of criteria including blood group, waiting time and currently negative cross-match. The other half of these pairs was allocated in accordance with the Eurotransplant (ET) criteria.

Results. Cold ischaemia time was an average of 14.02 h in Bonn vs 24.18 h in the ET group (P<0.0001). The number of HLA mismatches was calculated and, for example, for locus A it was 1.13 in Bonn vs 0.73 in the ET group (P=0.0003). One-year graft survival for the locally transplanted kidneys was 92.2% and, for the ET kidneys, 90.9%. Five-year survival was 79.5% vs 81.7%, respectively. Patient survival after 1 year was 100% vs 97.4%, and after 5 years, 93.4% vs 93.1%.

Conclusion. The results show that it is possible to provide patients with a locally allocated kidney graft that enables good function after a short waiting period. This procedure avoids long cold ischaemia time and long waiting periods.

Keywords: HLA compatibility; kidney transplantation; local allocation; long-term kidney survival; long-term patient survival

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Markus S. Gillich, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universität Bonn, Sigmund Freud Strasse 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany. Email: MGillich{at}t\|[hyphen]\|online.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Kessler, J.-M. Virion, M. Hachicha, B. Moulin, O. Toupance, J.-M. Rebibou, and F. Guillemin
Effect of the shipment of cadaveric renal allografts on allograft survival
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 1054 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Opelz
Very short ischaemia is not the answer
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 715 - 716.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. A. P. Koene
Should the allocation of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation be based on HLA matching?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 717 - 718.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.