Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rieger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffl, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rieger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffl, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 824-828
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Gadolinium as an alternative contrast agent for diagnostic and interventional angiographic procedures in patients with impaired renal function

Johannes Rieger1,, Thomas Sitter2, Marcel Toepfer2, Ulrich Linsenmaier1, Klaus Jürgen Pfeifer1 and Helmut Schiffl2

1 Department of Radiology and 2 Department of Nephrology, Medizinische Klinik – Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

Background. The study was designed to investigate the safety and feasibility of gadopentetate dimeglumine, a gadolinium-based contrast medium, as an alternative angiographic contrast agent in patients with impaired renal function and high risk for iodinated contrast-induced nephropathy.

Methods. Gadopentetate dimeglumine was used as the radiographic contrast agent in 32 diagnostic or interventional angiographic procedures in 29 patients (59% diabetics) with severe renal insufficiency (average serum creatinine of 3.6±1.4 mg/dl). The average dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine was 0.34±0.06 mmol/kg body weight. Gadopentetate dimeglumine was used either alone (n=20) or in conjunction with carbon dioxide (n=12).

Results. Thirty-two angiographic procedures (24 diagnostic angiographies and 8 interventional procedures) were performed in 29 patients. For diagnostic purposes, eleven selective renal arteriographies, six angiographies of the iliac arteries and lower extremities, and seven venous angiographies of the upper extremity and central veins were performed. Interventional procedures consisted of two percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasties with stenting, four percutaneous peripheral vascular interventions, and two balloon angioplasties of a dialysis fistula. None of the patients, except one, had evidence of post-procedure contrast material-induced renal failure (increase in serum creatinine >0.5 mg/dl within 72 h) or other complications. This patient had a clinically important increase in serum creatinine level after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty and stenting, probably due to cholesterol embolism. Gadopentetate dimeglumine had sufficient radiographic density to allow adequate diagnostic visualization with digital subtraction equipment in all cases.

Conclusions. Gadopentetate dimeglumine is an alternative and safe radiographic contrast agent for angiography and interventional procedures in patients with severe pre-existing renal impairment. In this population with high risk for contrast-induced acute renal failure, it is obviously less nephrotoxic than iodinated contrast media.

Keywords: angiography; contrast induced nephropathy; gadolinium; gadopentetate dimeglumine; renal artery stenosis

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Johannes Rieger, MD, Institut für Klinische Radiologie – Standort Innenstadt, Poliklinik, Pettenkoferstrasse 8a, D-80336 München. Email: jrieger{at}radin.med.uni-muenchen.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Habibi, M. S. Krishnam, D. G. Lohan, F. Barkhordarian, M. Jalili, R. S. Saleh, S. G. Ruehm, and J. P. Finn
High-Spatial-Resolution Lower Extremity MR Angiography at 3.0 T: Contrast Agent Dose Comparison Study
Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 680 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. C. Kane, A. W. Stanson, D. Kalnicka, D. W. Rosenthal, C. U. Lee, S. C. Textor, and V. D. Garovic
Comparison between gadolinium and iodine contrast for percutaneous intervention in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: clinical outcomes
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 1233 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. Sayin, S. Turhan, O. Akyurek, and M. Kilickap
Gadolinium:Nonionic Contrast Media (1:1) Coronary Angiography in Patients With Impaired Renal Function
Angiology, November 1, 2007; 58(5): 561 - 564.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. M. Elicker, Y. S. Cypel, and J. C. Weinreb
IV contrast administration for CT: a survey of practices for the screening and prevention of contrast nephropathy.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1651 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
I. Ergun, K. Keven, I. Uruc, Y. Ekmekci, B. Canbakan, I. Erden, and O. Karatan
The safety of gadolinium in patients with stage 3 and 4 renal failure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 697 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.