Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bos, H.
Right arrow Articles by Navis, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bos, H.
Right arrow Articles by Navis, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 793-797
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Do severe systemic sequelae of proteinuria modulate the antiproteinuric response to chronic ACE inhibition?

Hendrik Bos1,2, Robert H. Henning1, Paul E. de Jong2, Dick de Zeeuw1,2 and Gerjan Navis1,2,

1 Departments of Clinical Pharmacology 2 Nephrology, Faculty of Medical Sciences and Groningen University Institute of Drug Exploration (GUIDE), University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Background. ACE inhibition exerts an antiproteinuric and renoprotective effect. However, residual proteinuria is often present. As residual proteinuria is associated with a poor renal outcome, identification of its determinants is important. We found previously that the systemic sequelae of proteinuria enhance renal damage in untreated nephrotic rats. The impact of systemic nephrosis on renal therapy response, however, is unclear. In the present study we therefore investigated whether the severity of systemic nephrosis, estimated from plasma cholesterol, predicts residual proteinuria during ACE inhibition.

Methods. Sixty male Wistar rats with established adriamycin nephrosis were studied. Six weeks after the induction of nephrosis, rats were stratified for proteinuria and treated for 2 weeks with lisinopril (75 mg/l) or vehicle.

Results. At the start of treatment, median proteinuria was 744 mg/day (95% confidence interval (CI) 609–860) and plasma cholesterol was 10.4 mmol/l (95% CI 8.0–12.6), reflecting the state of systemic nephrosis. Lisinopril, but not vehicle, reduced blood pressure and proteinuria (-62%; range -70 to -48; P<0.001). Residual proteinuria was 275 mg/day, with a wide range (47–1119 mg/day). Pre-treatment proteinuria and pre-treatment cholesterol correlated positively with residual proteinuria. By multivariate analysis (r2 of model =0.92), both pre-treatment cholesterol and pre-treatment proteinuria were independent predictors of residual proteinuria. The quantitative impact of this multivariate analysis is illustrated by the difference in residual proteinuria between rats with a cholesterol:proteinuria ratio less than, compared with greater than, the median (residual proteinuria 298 mg/day (CI 129–496) vs 439 mg/day (CI 158–670), respectively). Blood pressure response was not predicted by the tested predictor variables.

Conclusions. In this model of proteinuria-induced renal damage, not only proteinuria as such, but also the concomitant nephrotic alterations predict residual proteinuria. Further studies, applying specific interventions, are needed to determine which components of the systemic derangements could play a causal role in the modulation of therapy response.

Keywords: established adriamycin nephrosis; lisinopril; plasma cholesterol; proteinuria; residual proteinuria; systemic nephrosis

Correspondence and offprint requests to: G. J. Navis, Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Hanzeplein 1, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands. Email: g.j.navis{at}int.azg.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. C. Cattran, H. N. Reich, H. J. Beanlands, J. A. Miller, J. W. Scholey, S. Troyanov, and for the Genes, Gender and Glomerulonephritis Group
The impact of sex in primary glomerulonephritis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2247 - 2253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
G. D Laverman, D. de Zeeuw, and G. Navis
Between-patient differences in the renal response to renin-angiotensin system intervention: clue to optimising renoprotective therapy?
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2002; 3(4): 205 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.