Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J.
Right arrow Articles by Orth, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J.
Right arrow Articles by Orth, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 780-787
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Combination treatment with an ETA-receptor blocker and an ACE inhibitor is not superior to the respective monotherapies in attenuating chronic transplant nephropathy in a ‘Fisher-to-Lewis’ rat model

Judith Adams1, Giulio Odoni2, Hiroaki Ogata2, Christiane Viedt2, Kerstin Amann3, Eberhard Ritz2 and Stephan R. Orth4,

Departments of 1 Urology and 2 Internal Medicine, Ruperto Carola University, Heidelberg, Germany, 3 Department of Pathology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany and 4 Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Berne (Inselspital), Berne, Switzerland

Background. Specific endothelin A (ETA)-receptor blockade and ACE inhibition attenuate chronic transplant nephropathy (CTN) in the ‘Fisher-to-Lewis’ rat model. It is unknown (i) which of both pharmacological interventions attenuates CTN more effectively and (ii) whether combination therapy exerts additive nephroprotection.

Methods. We compared (i) the effects of specific ETA-receptor blockade with LU 302146 (30 mg/kg bw/day) and ACE inhibition with trandolapril (0.3 mg/kg bw/day) and (ii) the effect of a combination therapy of both drugs on the development of CTN. Kidneys of Fisher rats were orthotopically grafted to Lewis rats. Untreated ‘Fisher-to-Lewis’ allografts served as controls (TX). All animals received low-dose cyclosporin A (1.5 mg/kg body weight) for 10 days post-transplant to inhibit early acute rejection episodes. The duration of the experiment was 36 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every other week by tail plethysmography. Indices of glomerulosclerosis (GS), tubulointerstitial and vascular damage, number of glomeruli, total glomerular volume and mean glomerular volume were measured using morphometric and stereological techniques, respectively. Albuminuria, blood chemistry and haematology were measured at the end of the experiment.

Results. LU 302146 did not affect systolic BP. In contrast, trandolapril and combination treatment significantly reduced systolic BP. Histological signs of CTN were almost completely prevented by LU 302146 and trandolapril as compared to TX, e.g. GS=0.8±0.08 and 0.9±0.20 vs 1.8±0.21* (arbitrary unit; *P<0.001 vs treated groups). Allograft weight was significantly lower in treated vs TX animals. Trandolapril and combination therapy, but not LU 302146 alone, abrogated glomerular hypertrophy, i.e. mean glomerular volume: TX 2.22±0.43, trandolapril 1.61±0.38**, LU 302146 2.22±0.11, trandolapril+LU 302146 1.78±0.28* (µm3; *P<0.05 vs control and LU 302146, **P<0.01 vs control and LU 302146). Albuminuria was lower in treated compared to TX animals. Combination therapy did not confer additional benefit compared to the respective monotherapies.

Conclusions. We conclude that ETA-receptor blockade abrogates GS, tubulointerstitial and vascular damage in the ‘Fisher-to-Lewis’ model of CTN to a similar extent as ACE inhibition. However, only ACE inhibition inhibits glomerular hypertrophy. In contrast to ACE inhibition, the effect of ETA-receptor blockade is independent of BP. This finding is consistent with the notion that ETA-receptor mediated events play a partly BP-independent role in the genesis of CTN. Combination therapy exerts no additive nephroprotection.

Keywords: ACE inhibitor; chronic rejection; chronic transplant nephropathy; endothelin; endothelin receptor antagonist; ETA-receptor

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Stephan R. Orth, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Berne (Inselspital), Freiburgstr. 10, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland. Email: stephan.orth{at}insel.ch


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. Frank, M. Zeier, M.-L. Gross, R. Waldherr, E. Ritz, and K. Amann
Comprehensive immunohistological analysis of the endothelin system in human kidney grafts
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1365 - 1372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. R. Orth, G. Odoni, H. Karkoszka, H. Ogata, C. Viedt, K. Amann, P. Ferrari, and E. Ritz
Combination treatment with an ETA-receptor blocker and an ACE inhibitor is not superior to the respective monotherapies in attenuating chronic transplant vasculopathy in different aorta allotransplantation rat models
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 62 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.