Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Cean, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cha, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Cean, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cha, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 2226-2230
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Preliminary Communication

Infective endocarditis in chronic haemodialysis: two treatment strategies

Juan Fernández-Cean, Asunción Alvarez, Sergio Burguez, Graciela Baldovinos, Patricia Larre-Borges and Mercedes Cha

Centro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay

Abstract

Background. Infective endocarditis (IE) is more frequent in patients on chronic haemodialysis (CHD) than in the general population and vascular access is the more frequent identified port of its entry. According to experimental and clinical studies the vascular access may also interfere with the treatment of IE. To improve the treatment of IE in CHD, patients were temporarily switched to peritoneal dialysis (PD) after the removal of the vascular access. In this preliminary report the outcome of IE in those CHD patients switched to PD is compared with the outcome in IE patients who remained on CHD.

Methods. All cases of IE that occurred during a 5 year period were retrospectively analysed. The Duke criteria for IE were used for diagnosis. All patients underwent transoesophageal echocardiography. All patients were treated with the same schedule of antibiotic treatment. The vascular access of a patient was removed when it was judged to be the source of infection.

Results. Twenty-one patients were studied. Twelve patients had been temporarily switched to PD after the diagnosis of IE and nine patients had remained on CHD treatment. There were not statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to demographic data, comorbid diseases and the frequency of Staphylococcus aureus as the causative germ. In-hospital mortality was 8.3% in patients switched to PD and 55.5% in patients maintained on HD (P: 0.03).

Conclusions. The data presented here suggest that the high mortality of IE in CHD patients may also be associated with the vascular access necessary for HD. If these results are confirmed by prospective studies with higher numbers of patients, PD could turn out to have a place in the treatment of IE in CHD patients.

Keywords: haemodialysis; infective endocarditis; peritoneal dialysis; vascular access

Notes

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Juan Fernandez-Cean, Servicio de Asistencia Renal Integral – SARI. Ibirapitá 2743, Montevideo. Uruguay. Email: jcean{at}hc.edu.uy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. Nucifora, L. P. Badano, P. Viale, P. Gianfagna, G. Allocca, D. Montanaro, U. Livi, and P. M. Fioretti
Infective endocarditis in chronic haemodialysis patients: an increasing clinical challenge
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2007; 28(19): 2307 - 2312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.