Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eardley, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eardley, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 1982-1987
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Efficacy of the accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule used in haemodialysis patients post-exposure to virus: a single-centre experience

Kevin S. Eardley1,, Helen E. Jones2, Husam Osman2 and Steve A. Smith1

1 Department of Nephrology and 2 Public Health Laboratory Service, Birmingham Heartlands and Solihull NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK

Background. The hepatitis B (HB) vaccination regime currently recommended for use in the UK for both preventative and post-exposure purposes is the accelerated regime, although there have been no recent reports of its efficacy. This observational study reports on the response rate achieved and longevity of protection conferred with this regime in a large number of haemodialysis patients following an episode of HB exposure.

Methods. One-hundred and five patients received primary vaccination (vaccine administered at 0, 1 and 2 months). Eighty-six completed the regime, receiving a booster dose at month 12. Measuring antibodies to HB surface antigen (anti-HBS) 6 weeks after receiving the third and fourth doses assessed patients’ response. Seventy-seven patients subsequently had anti-HBs measured at month 24.

Results. The response rate (anti-HBS >10 mIU/ml) to primary vaccination and the complete regime was 33 and 73%, respectively. Non-European patients responded better to primary vaccination than Europeans (P=0.014). Those receiving steroids responded less well to the complete vaccination regime (P=0.007). Patient's age, sex, renal diagnosis, diabetes mellitus, time on dialysis, dialysis adequacy, erythropoietin dose, hepatitis C or body weight did not affect response rates. By month 24, 24 responders (44%) had lost seroprotection. Antibody levels achieved with vaccination by transient responders was significantly lower than persistent responders. No patients became HB surface antigen positive during the 2-year study.

Conclusion. Reserving the accelerated vaccination to the post-exposure scenario will expose many more patients to the risk of HB cross-infection than if used prophylactically. Regular monitoring is required if seroprotection is to be maintained.

Keywords: chronic renal failure; exposure; hepatitis B; recombinant hepatitis B vaccine

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Kevin S. Eardley, Birmingham Heartlands and Solihull NHS Trust, Department of Nephrology, Birmingham, UK. Email: keardley1{at}yahoo.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Fehr and P. M. Ambuhl
Chronic hepatitis virus infections in patients on renal replacement therapy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1049 - 1053.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.