Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tozawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Takishita, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tozawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Takishita, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 1819-1824
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Analysis of drug prescription in chronic haemodialysis patients

Masahiko Tozawa, Kunitoshi Iseki, Chiho Iseki, Saori Oshiro, Yasushi Higashiuesato, Masanobu Yamazato, Nozomi Tomiyama, Takeshi Tana and Shuichi Takishita

Third Department of Internal Medicine and Dialysis Unit, University of The Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan

Background. Information concerning medication use in Asian haemodialysis patients is sparse. We surveyed prescribed medications and examined the relation between the number of medications and mortality and clinical characteristics in chronic haemodialysis patients, in Okinawa, Japan.

Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional multicentre survey in August 1999 and patients were observed during 13 months of follow up.

Results. The clinical demographics of 850 chronic haemodialysis patients in seven dialysis units were obtained. Compared with the mean number of medications prescribed in ambulatory patients treated in general practice reported from Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan (2.7 (n=20 716)), the mean number medications in haemodialysis patients was larger (7.2 (n=850)). The three most prescribed drug types in haemodialysis patients were those related to calcium and phosphate metabolism (88%), antihypertensive agents (71%), and erythropoietin (60%). Among the 850 patients, 38 died during the 13-month follow-up period. The number of medications was positively associated with mortality after adjusting for age, sex, and other clinical factors: the hazard ratio was 1.14 (95% confidence interval 1.03–1.26, P=0.007). A multiple linear regression analysis using the number of medications as a dependent factor and sex and other clinical characteristics as independent factors revealed that male sex (P=0.04), diabetes mellitus (P<0.0001), and duplication of drugs (P<0.0001) were positively correlated with the number of medications.

Conclusions. Multiple drug use was observed in haemodialysis patients. The number of prescribed drugs was a significant predictor of short-term mortality. Male sex, diabetes mellitus, and duplication of drugs were correlated with increases in the number of medications.

Keywords: end-stage renal disease; haemodialysis; mortality; multiple drug use

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Masahiko Tozawa, MD, Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of The Ryukyus, 207 Uehara, Nishihara-cho, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan. Email: mtozawa{at}eb.mbn.or.jp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. K. Ghosh
Challenges in taking care of patients on chronic haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1412 - 1412.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Tozawa, K. Iseki, C. Iseki, K. Kinjo, Y. Ikemiya, and S. Takishita
Blood Pressure Predicts Risk of Developing End-Stage Renal Disease in Men and Women
Hypertension, June 1, 2003; 41(6): 1341 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.