Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (69)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heaf, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heaf, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 112-117
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis

James G. Heaf1,, Hans Løkkegaard1 and Melvin Madsen2

1 Department of Nephrology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University and 2 Department of Nephrology, Skejby Hospital, Aarhus University, Denmark

Background. The influence of dialysis modality on prognosis is controversial. In the absence of randomized trials, epidemiological investigations present the best method for studying the problem.

Methods. 4568 haemodialysis (HD) and 2443 peritoneal dialysis (PD) records in 4921 dialysis patients treated between 1990 and 1999 were retrieved from the Danish Terminal Uremia register in order to determine the influence of dialysis form on prognosis. The register is national, comprehensive, and incident.

Results. Factors reducing survival included age, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, lung disease, diabetes, alcoholism, haematological disease, but not sex or hypertension. Transplant non-candidacy was associated with an adjusted relative risk of 4.7 (CI 4.0–5.6). PD mortality relative to HD (after correction for comorbidity and transplant candidacy) was 0.65 (CI 0.59–0.72, P<0.001) on an ‘as treated’ and ‘history’ analysis and 0.86 (CI 0.78–0.95, P<0.01) on an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The difference was confined to the first 2 years of dialysis. Change in dialysis modality was associated with increased mortality, and change from PD to HD with an accelerated mortality for the first 6 months. This was presumably due to the transfer of sick PD patients, but did not explain the difference. The relative advantage of PD was lower for diabetic patients, where it was not significant on ITT analysis. Dialysis prognosis improved by 14% during the period, with similar results for HD and PD patients. PD patients who were subsequently transplanted had a significantly shorter time to onset of graft function (3.5 vs 5.1 days, P<0.05).

Conclusions. These results show a survival advantage for PD during the first 2 years of dialysis treatment. This may be due to unregistered differences in comorbidity at the start of treatment, or may be causal, possibly due to better preservation of residual renal function. The study lends credence to the ‘integrative care’ approach to uraemia, where patients are started on PD and transferred to HD when PD related mortality increases.

Keywords: epidemiology; haemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; renal transplantation survival

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr James Heaf, Graevlingestien 9, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark. Email: heaf{at}dadlnet.dk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
D. W. Johnson, H. Dent, C. M. Hawley, S. P. McDonald, J. B. Rosman, F. G. Brown, K. Bannister, and K. J. Wiggins
Association of Dialysis Modality and Cardiovascular Mortality in Incident Dialysis Patients
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2009; 4(10): 1620 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Liberek, M. Renke, B. Skonieczny, K. Kotewicz, J. Kowalewska, M. Chmielewski, J. Kot, M. Lichodziejewska-Niemierko, and B. Rutkowski
Therapy outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients transferred from haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2889 - 2894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
C.-C. Shiao, T.-W. Kao, K.-Y. Hung, Y.-C. Chen, M.-S. Wu, T.-S. Chu, K.-D. Wu, and T.-J. Tsai
SEVEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS IN TAIWAN
Perit. Dial. Int., July 1, 2009; 29(4): 450 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
J. Portoles, G. del Peso, M. J. Fernandez-Reyes, M. A. Bajo, P. Lopez-Sanchez, and the GCDP
PREVIOUS COMORBIDITY AND LACK OF PATIENT FREE CHOICE OF TECHNIQUE PREDICT EARLY MORTALITY IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
Perit. Dial. Int., March 1, 2009; 29(2): 150 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
C.-C. Lee, C.-Y. Sun, and M.-S. Wu
LONG-TERM MODALITY-RELATED MORTALITY ANALYSIS IN INCIDENT DIALYSIS PATIENTS
Perit. Dial. Int., March 1, 2009; 29(2): 182 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
B. Tokgoz
CLINICAL ADVANTAGES OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
Perit. Dial. Int., February 1, 2009; 29(Supplement_2): S59 - S61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. P. McDonald, M. R. Marshall, D. W. Johnson, and K. R. Polkinghorne
Relationship between Dialysis Modality and Mortality
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 155 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
C. P. Lee, G. M. Chertow, and S. A. Zenios
Optimal Initiation and Management of Dialysis Therapy
Operations Research, November 1, 2008; 56(6): 1428 - 1449.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
R. van den Berg, T. T. Cnossen, C. J. A. M. Konings, J. P. Kooman, F. M. van der Sande, and K. M. L. Leunissen
Different treatment options in peritoneal dialysis
NDT Plus, October 1, 2008; 1(suppl_4): iv14 - iv17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. M. Just, F. Th. de Charro, E. A. Tschosik, L. L. Noe, S. K. Bhattacharyya, and M. C. Riella
Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2365 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. Baboolal, P. McEwan, S. Sondhi, P. Spiewanowski, J. Wechowski, and K. Wilson
The cost of renal dialysis in a UK setting--a multicentre study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1982 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. v. Biesen, N. Veys, N. Lameire, and R. Vanholder
Why less success of the peritoneal dialysis programmes in Europe?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1478 - 1481.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Viglino, L. Neri, S. Alloatti, G. Cabiddu, R. Cocchi, A. Limido, G. Marinangeli, R. Russo, U. Teatini, and F. P. Schena
Analysis of the factors conditioning the diffusion of peritoneal dialysis in Italy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3601 - 3605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
O. Khawar, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, W. K. Lo, D. Johnson, and R. Mehrotra
Is the Declining Use of Long-Term Peritoneal Dialysis Justified by Outcome Data?
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1317 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
R. T. Krediet
30 YEARS OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS DEVELOPMENT: THE PAST AND THE FUTURE
Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S35 - S41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
W.-K. Lo
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS UTILIZATION AND OUTCOME: WHAT ARE WE FACING?
Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S42 - S47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
Y.-L. Kim
CAN WE OVERCOME THE PREDESTINED POOR SURVIVAL OF DIABETIC PATIENTS? PERSPECTIVES FROM PRE- AND POST-DIALYSIS
Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S171 - S175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
S. Kuriyama
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES: ARE THE BENEFITS GREATER THAN THE DISADVANTAGES?
Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S190 - S195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
J. M. Bargman
New Technologies in Peritoneal Dialysis
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 2(3): 576 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. Van Biesen, F. Verbeke, and R. Vanholder
Cardiovascular disease in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: arguments pro peritoneal dialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 53 - 58.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
J. K. Inrig, J. L. Sun, Q. Yang, L. P. Briley, and L. A. Szczech
Mortality by Dialysis Modality among Patients Who Have End-Stage Renal Disease and Are Awaiting Renal Transplantation
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2006; 1(4): 774 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. de Jonge, B. Bammens, W. Lemahieu, B. D. Maes, and Y. Vanrenterghem
Comparison of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis after renal transplant failure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1669 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. R. Rubin, N. E. Fink, L. C. Plantinga, J. H. Sadler, A. S. Kliger, and N. R. Powe
Patient Ratings of Dialysis Care With Peritoneal Dialysis vs Hemodialysis
JAMA, February 11, 2004; 291(6): 697 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Heaf
Underutilization of Peritoneal Dialysis
JAMA, February 11, 2004; 291(6): 740 - 742.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. C. Rayner, R. L. Pisoni, J. Bommer, B. Canaud, E. Hecking, F. Locatelli, L. Piera, J. L. Bragg-Gresham, H. I. Feldman, D. A. Goodkin, et al.
Mortality and hospitalization in haemodialysis patients in five European countries: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 108 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.