Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macdougall, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macdougall, I. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 14-21
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association



An overview of the efficacy and safety of novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP)

Iain C. Macdougall

Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK

Abstract

Novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP, also known as darbepoetin alfa) is a molecule that stimulates erythropoiesis by the same mechanism as both native and recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). The extra sialic residues on NESP, however, allow it to be more stable in vivo with a 2- to 3-fold longer elimination half-life. Thus, following intravenous administration, the mean elimination half-life of NESP is 25.3 vs 8.5 h for rHuEPO. After subcutaneous administration, the mean terminal half-life for NESP is 48.8 h. The mean bioavailability of NESP after subcutaneous administration is ~37%, similar to that reported for rHuEPO. The pharmacokinetic data suggested that patients with renal anaemia would require less frequent dosing with NESP than with rHuEPO. NESP 0.45 µg/kg administered once weekly either intravenously or subcutaneously has been evaluated for the correction of chronic renal failure (CRF)-associated anaemia. The study population included CRF patients not receiving dialysis, along with those on haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. In patients who are rHuEPO-naïve, NESP has a similar effect in correcting the anaemia as is seen with rHuEPO, but with less frequent dosing. Similarly, in patients previously receiving rHuEPO, NESP (whether administered intravenously or subcutaneously) is as effective as rHuEPO treatment for maintaining haemoglobin concentration when administered at a reduced frequency (i.e. either once weekly or once every other week). NESP is well tolerated, adverse effects are similar to those seen with rHuEPO, and no antibodies have been detected in >1500 patients exposed to NESP thus far.

Keywords: anaemia; chronic renal failure; dialysis; dosing frequency; haemoglobin; NESP

Notes

Correspondence and offprints requests to: Dr Iain C. Macdougall, Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital, East Dulwich Grove, London SE22 8PT, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Bommer, G. Asmus, M. Wenning, and G. Bommer
A comparison of haemoglobin levels and doses in haemodialysis patients treated with subcutaneous or intravenous darbepoetin alfa: a German prospective, randomized, multicentre study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 30, 2008; (2008) gfn416v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. Djukanovic, V. Lezaic, R. Blagojevic, D. Radivojevic, M. Stosovic, N. Jovanovic, S. Ristic, and S. Simic-Ogrizovic
Co-morbidity and kidney graft failure--two main causes of malnutrition in kidney transplant patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2003; 18(90005): v68 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
T Ng, G Marx, T Littlewood, and I Macdougall
Recombinant erythropoietin in clinical practice
Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2003; 79(933): 367 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.